Skip to content
Review Open access

Five decades of gene therapy innovation and regulation in the US and EU: a historical analysis.

Oct 2026 · Molecular Therapy · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

Investigating how gene therapy regulatory regimes have developed in the US and EU between 1973 and 2025 and how gene therapy regulation events contributing to regulatory regime building have shaped gene therapy innovation outcomes found that regulatory leadership in gene therapy has shifted repeatedly between the US and the EU.

Abstract

The development of gene therapy is characterized by expectations of patient benefits, but challenges persist, including rapid technological change and, typically, small target populations. This has thus far resulted in relatively few gene therapies reaching the market and benefiting patients. Regulation plays a central role in shaping how these challenges are addressed and how gene therapies reach patients. This study investigated how gene therapy regulatory regimes have developed in the US and EU between 1973 and 2025, and how gene therapy regulation events contributing to regulatory regime building have shaped gene therapy innovation outcomes. We conducted a scoping review of scientific literature and expert interviews, which together characterized all authorized gene therapies in the US and EU. We constructed and validated timelines of gene therapy regulation events in these regimes. Interviewees attributed observed differences in the timelines to factors specific to gene therapy regulation and to the broader medicines regulatory system. Regulatory leadership in gene therapy has shifted repeatedly between the US and the EU, reflecting differences in how each jurisdiction responds to scientific and technological uncertainty, societal risks and needs, and commercial pressure.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Regulatory Evolution and Transformation of China's Cell and Gene Therapy Industry

The Regulation on the Administration of Clinical Research and Clinical Translational Application of New Biomedical Technologies, which entered into force in 2026, is interpreted, with a particular focus on its new dual-track regulatory framework that comprises a drug registration pathway and a new biomedical technology...

Wei Li, Zhen Qin, Xiu'e Wang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Gene therapies (2015-2025): determinants of translational success.

Over the past decade, 28 gene therapies have received regulatory approvals in the United States, yet a larger number of pipeline candidates failed. Comprehensive evaluation of gene therapies from both ends of the translational spectrum requires a unified framework through which all therapies can be efficiently analyzed...

Jessica Sackett, Sammy Jaber, Pritha Gangapur et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Regulatory Progress in the Clinical Translation of Gene Therapy in China: Evolution, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.

In recent years, gene therapy has emerged as a major frontier in biomedicine, with translation from basic research to clinical application accelerating worldwide. Clinical research in this field has also expanded substantially in China. Prior to the implementation of the new regulatory framework in 2026, investigator-i...

Kai-Zhen Wang, Nvjin Zeng, Hua-Lan Yang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Advancing Gene Therapy: Bridging Innovation, Access, and Implementation in Genetic and Rare Diseases

This abstract book presents five undergraduate research proposals developed for a genetics research case competition organized by the Global Society for Genetics and Genome Biology Queen’s Chapter at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. The competition focused on advancing gene therapy by considering scient...

Zahra Abba, Abdullah H. Salama, Malika Peera et al. · 0 citations
#gene editing Review Open access Sep 2026

Beyond Precision: A Multidimensional Framework for Selecting Genetic Medicine Platforms

A multidimensional framework is proposed in which gene therapy platforms are evaluated according to three intrinsic properties—genetic precision, temporal control, and dosage tunability—while delivery, clinical maturity, and disease context act as major translational constraints.

Jared Wieland, P. Jackson, William Penrod et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.