Jul 2026· Big Data and Cognitive Computing· 2 citations· 50 references
TL;DR
An application-focused review of 35 selected empirical studies focusing on the use of AI during software testing, based on PRISMA guidelines, reveals that large language models, machine learning, and computer vision can significantly improve testing efficiency.
Abstract
The rapid evolution of software complexity demands more efficient and autonomous testing mechanisms. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a solution to the limitations of traditional manual testing in software development, which is time-consuming, prone to human error, and unable to scale with the increasing size and complexity of modern software systems. In this context, this paper presents an application-focused review of 35 selected empirical studies focusing on the use of AI during software testing, based on PRISMA guidelines. We introduce a comprehensive taxonomy categorizing current research into six core fields, including test case generation, defect prediction, and AI model verification. The analysis reveals that large language models, machine learning, and computer vision can significantly improve testing efficiency. Key findings demonstrate that AI can autonomously repair broken test scripts, generate robust synthetic data, enable codeless web testing, and accurately predict system defects before execution. Furthermore, advanced techniques such as reinforcement learning and deep learning successfully validate complex environments, including cloud robotics and quantum software. However, our qualitative and quantitative synthesis also highlights that challenges, such as generative AI “hallucinations” and the brittleness of Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) integration, persist. Ultimately, this review proposes a tailored research roadmap for robust industrial adoption, showing that AI is changing the way software is tested, shifting it from a predominantly reactive and static activity toward a proactive, intelligence-driven discipline.
How traditional and AI-powered tools are used in four critical areas test management, test case management, defect management, and version management is discussed and the study results prove that AI-powered testing is better than traditional testing in each of these areas.
Rajat Sharma, Shahid Ali· VLSI & Embedded Systems...· 0 citations
It is concluded that AI-enabled test automation can improve testing efficiency and adaptability when learning mechanisms are combined with controlled validation, risk-based decision criteria, and human oversight.
N. Gunasekara, Tharushi Senanayake· The American Journal of Inte...· 0 citations
The analysis indicates that combining predictive defect-risk scores with automated test selection can potentially reduce redundant testing, concentrate computational resources on high-risk software components, and improve feedback speed, but model reliability depends on historical defect data, feature quality, distribu...
Haruto Tanaka, Yuki Nakamura· Frontiers in Emerging Multid...· 0 citations
This research examines an AI-enabled approach to test-case generation and optimization for modern software development by synthesizing evidence from studies concerning augmented reality, simulation-based learning, computational visualization, embedded-system monitoring, and AI-driven software quality engineering.
Dinesh Perera, Nethmi Fernando· International Journal of Nex...· 0 citations
This review traces how quality engineering has changed, from rule-based automation to self-adjusting test frameworks, and looks at the technology behind Autonomous Quality Agents: Large Language Models that generate code from requirements, Computer Vision that handles visual regression, and Reinforcement Learning that...
Vanshita Agarwal· International journal for ad...· 0 citations
This study presents a comprehensive survey and comparative analysis of AI-based techniques for error detection and automated program repair, revealing that while LLM-based approaches significantly outperform traditional methods in repair capability, challenges remain in patch correctness validation, computational cost,...
A. Aladwani, Sultan Alsamaani, Turki Alrumaykhani et al.· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.