TIGER is presented, an inference-time framework that redesigns feedback for localized repair that reduces unsupported content while preserving task quality and a CrisisFACTS case study suggests that the same repair mechanism can improve grounding in multi-source settings.
Abstract
We study fact-level repair for multimodal generation, where a fluent output may contain specific facts that are not supported by the input. Existing inference-time repair methods often generate feedback by jointly conditioning on the input and the current output. This design has two limitations: hallucinated claims in the output can bias the model's interpretation of the input, and free-form feedback cannot be ranked or scheduled at the fact level. We present TIGER, an inference-time framework that redesigns feedback for localized repair. TIGER independently extracts an observation graph from the input and a claim graph from the current output, then assigns each claim a graph-conditioned risk score based on support and conflict. The model repairs selected high-risk claims while keeping the backbone frozen. We provide a convergence analysis showing that the expected total risk decreases geometrically to an explicit asymptotic bound under mild assumptions. Experiments across four cross-modal paths, including image-to-text, image+text-to-text, audio-to-text, and video-to-text, show that TIGER reduces unsupported content while preserving task quality. The gains hold across multiple backbones, and a CrisisFACTS case study suggests that the same repair mechanism can improve grounding in multi-source settings.
USteer, a simple, training-free steering mechanism that adjusts a model's layer-wise activations during inference using the gradient of a confidence measure with respect to the activations, demonstrates that confidence signals can be leveraged not only for detection, but also for effective inference-time control of mod...
Li-Tian Liu, Qi-Qi Hou, Yu-Bin Jian et al.· 0 citations
HallDetect, a lightweight, reference-free, and black-box framework for hallucination detection, is presented, a lightweight, reference-free, and black-box framework for hallucination detection that is evaluated not only on summarization but across a broader range of source-grounded generation settings.
Achir Oukelmoun, N. Semmar, Gaël de Chalendar· 0 citations
Bounded margins mitigate confident hallucinations during post-training, implemented through an entropy-dependent margin bound in direct preference optimization (DPO) and shown to mitigate confident hallucinations during post-training.
Qing-Jia Huang, Ya-Kai Li, Jian-Guo Wu et al.· 0 citations
Large language models (LLMs) can generate fluent and confident responses that are factually incorrect, unsupported by evidence, or inconsistent with the source material. These hallucinations reduce the reliability of LLM-based question answering, summariza tion, dialogue, and information retrieval systems, especially w...
This paper reviews the literature on why RAG systems continue to hallucinate even when correct evidence is available in context, organizes the reported causes into a five-part taxonomy, and surveys the detection methods and mitigation strategies proposed against each cause.
Sanchita H., Skandamahima V. M., Akshitha Katkeri· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
This work introduces the task of hallucination span detection with input-side evidence alignment, which jointly identifies hallucinated spans and aligns output tokens with the corresponding input evidence.
Miyu Yamada, Yuki Arase· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.