Skip to content

REALM: Reliable Expertise-Aware Language Model Fine-Tuning from Noisy Annotations

Apr 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2604.17289 · 0 citations · 39 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

REALM is proposed, which jointly learns the model parameters and a scalar expertise value for each annotator, entirely unsupervised and requiring nothing beyond annotator identity, and extends to multiple tasks via a learned expertise matrix.

Abstract

Supervised fine-tuning of large language models relies on human-annotated data, yet annotation pipelines routinely involve multiple crowdworkers of heterogeneous expertise. Standard practice aggregates labels via majority vote or simple averaging, discarding annotator identity and causing the model to absorb the errors of unreliable annotators into its parameters. We propose REALM, which jointly learns the model parameters and a scalar expertise value for each annotator, entirely unsupervised and requiring nothing beyond annotator identity. The key idea is to model each observed label as a mixture between the model's prediction and a uniform random guess, weighted by the annotator's learned expertise. REALM applies to any task with a fixed label set, and extends to multiple tasks via a learned expertise matrix. On four text-classification datasets with \emph{real} crowdsourced annotations, REALM is the best method in all $12$ configurations of the three heterogeneous-annotator datasets, improving on the strongest applicable baseline, including majority vote and Dawid--Skene aggregation, by $+2.9$ points on average. On five question answering benchmarks with simulated noisy labels, it outperforms naive noisy fine-tuning in $152$ of $162$ configurations, by $+5.0$ points on average, with gains that grow with model capacity. The learned expertise additionally recovers annotator reliability without ever observing it. Our code is available at https://github.com/sajjad-ucsb/REALM

View source

Similar papers

#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

QUORUM: QUality-Optimized Routing Using Multiple annotators

This work introduces QUORUM (QUality-Optimized Routing Using Multiple annotators), a budget-aware routing framework that dynamically assigns each instance to human or LLM annotators under a fixed annotation budget and supports multiple annotations per instance, combining them through agreement-based rewards to improve...

Antonio Purificato, Maria Sofia Bucarelli, Andrea Bacciu et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

Object Detection Benchmarks are Incomplete: The Role of Label Errors and Annotation Uncertainty

This work introduces a scalable annotation pipeline that emphasizes high recall and captures ambiguity through soft labels aggregated from at least 11 annotators per object, and shows that benchmark performance is highly sensitive to annotation quality, although model rankings remain largely stable.

Sarina Penquitt, Jonathan Klees, Antonia van Betteray et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Sep 2026

Surface Matching in Skill Recommenders: Incomplete Evaluation Hides Simplicity Bias

Two training-time mitigations, label augmentation and shortcut-targeted hard negatives, which reduce judged nonsense while preserving ranking performance are studied.

W. Veys, Matthias De Lange, Jens-Joris Decorte et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Semantic Uncertainty Quantification Needs Factual Equivalence

A single encoder trained contrastively to isolate the targeted fact, utilizing synthetic data generated by an LLM and dataset both disjoint from all evaluation settings improves performance on 120 of 126 evaluation settings (95%) spanning 18 model dataset combinations across language and vision-language models.

Joseph Hoche, Quentin Guimard, Gianni Franchi · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.