Overall, findings suggest that current systems remain insufficiently adapted to the MENA context, underscoring the need for culturally grounded, dialect-sensitive, and clinically supervised approaches to ensure safe and effective integration.
Abstract
Mental health disorders represent a growing burden across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, where depression and anxiety are highly prevalent amid conflict, displacement, and socioeconomic strain, affecting up to 40 percent of adults, yet treatment gaps remain at 80-95% due to provider shortages, financial strain, and cultural barriers. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI), in the form of large language models (LLMs) and specialized psychotherapy chatbots, may offer a scalable adjunct to help address these gaps through anonymous screening, predictive risk modeling, psychoeducation, and brief interventions. This narrative review examines current evidence of AI-driven conversational tools in mental health with a specific focus on their application, acceptance, and limitations within the MENA region. To do so, A structured search of MEDLINE and Embase (2000–2026) identified studies on conversational AI in mental health, prioritizing evidence from the MENA region and supplemented by relevant global literature. Overall, findings suggest that while these tools offer high accessibility and user engagement, particularly for low-intensity support, their effectiveness is limited by linguistic and cultural mismatches, including Arabic diglossia and poor alignment with locally grounded expressions of distress. At the same time, user acceptance reflects a paradox in which stigma and privacy concerns drive reliance on anonymous AI tools while simultaneously limiting trust in their clinical reliability, reinforcing a preference for hybrid models with human oversight. Taken together, these findings indicate that current systems remain insufficiently adapted to the MENA context, underscoring the need for culturally grounded, dialect-sensitive, and clinically supervised approaches to ensure safe and effective integration.
These technologies show promise in reducing human error and enhancing mental health care delivery; however, persistent challenges include data privacy, ethical considerations, and the need for diverse, large-scale datasets.
Juster Donal Sinaga· Journal of Society Counselin...· 0 citations
The findings indicate that AI is potentially able to stimulate accessibility, engagement, and temporary relief of symptoms, but future research should focus on long-term outcomes and safeguards to ensure safe, transparent integration into mental health care.
The International Workshop on AI for Cognitive and Mental Health Support is proposed, a half-day interdisciplinary forum that brings together researchers and practitioners from data mining, machine learning, NLP, NLP, HCI, healthcare, and social sciences to advance trustworthy, effective, and socially responsible AI so...
Xiangmeng Wang, Haoyang Li, Chen Li et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
A multimodal emotion-aware architecture, which pays attention to memory-enhanced personalization and emotion-specific reinforcement learning, is introduced and hybrid human-AI approaches, which focus on safety and empathetic conversation to improve current mental health systems are recommended.
This editorial updates the research priorities articulated by JMIR Mental Health in 2023, while reaffirming their emphasis on equity, replicability, privacy, efficacy, and engagement.
M. Birk, Shruti Kochhar, Keris Myrick et al.· JMIR Mental Health· 1 citation
A list of eight best practices was created to assist developers with designing AI systems in a way that would reduce the overall risk of harm for users attempting to use their AI for mental health cases.
Joshua Frankenfield, Briana M. Sobel, Barbara Chaparro· Proceedings of the Internati...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.