This editorial updates the research priorities articulated by JMIR Mental Health in 2023, while reaffirming their emphasis on equity, replicability, privacy, efficacy, and engagement.
Abstract
Abstract Digital mental health has become an established part of mental health care, but the rapid arrival of large language models and other artificial intelligence (AI) tools has refocused attention on the evidence needed to guide the field. This editorial updates the research priorities articulated by JMIR Mental Health in 2023, while reaffirming their emphasis on equity, replicability, privacy, efficacy, and engagement. While the importance of these priorities has not changed in recent years, the urgency with which they must now be applied has. As digital tools become more clinically consequential, research must move beyond demonstrating that a technology is feasible, usable, or novel. The field now needs studies that clarify how these tools work, for whom they are beneficial, under what conditions they may cause harm, and how they can be ethically integrated into care. We call for research that is transparent about the technologies being studied, grounded in meaningful clinical questions, attentive to safety, and designed to produce knowledge that remains useful as specific products and models change.
Five priorities define a translational agenda for 2026 and beyond: AI in mental health will succeed not through model performance alone, but through disciplined integration into clinical workflows, measurement systems, and governance structures that ensure safety, equity, and real-world effectiveness.
Martin P. Paulus, J. Torous, R. Perlis et al.· NPP—Digital Psychiatry and N...· 0 citations
A standardized facts label for AI-DMHTs is proposed designed to enhance transparency and awareness about these tools and their risks to users, patients, and clinicians and serves as a foundation for continued multidisciplinary collaboration regarding the development and governance of AI risk communication in the domain...
K. Moon, Matthew Tamura, J. R. Redmond et al.· Frontiers in Psychiatry· 0 citations
This scoping review aims to systematically map the harms which may arise from engaging with AI for mental health support, as formulated in the academic literature, regulatory frameworks, grey literature, and practitioner guidance, to inform the co-production of a harm taxonomy.
X. Hunt, A. G. Mokaya, Sara Zannone et al.· Wellcome Open Research· 0 citations
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly becoming embedded in everyday mental health help-seeking practices, particularly among young people who already turn to digital platforms as gateways to mental health support. While LLMs offer unprecedented immediacy and accessibility, their integration into help-seeking ecosyst...
Claudette Pretorius· Information Hiding· 0 citations
Overall, findings suggest that current systems remain insufficiently adapted to the MENA context, underscoring the need for culturally grounded, dialect-sensitive, and clinically supervised approaches to ensure safe and effective integration.
Sara El Hajj, Ahmad Nsouli, M. Wehbe et al.· Frontiers in Psychiatry· 0 citations
A list of eight best practices was created to assist developers with designing AI systems in a way that would reduce the overall risk of harm for users attempting to use their AI for mental health cases.
Joshua Frankenfield, Briana M. Sobel, Barbara Chaparro· Proceedings of the Internati...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.