Skip to content
Preprint

Pretraining Data Can Be Poisoned through Computational Propaganda

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 22 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work demonstrates the importance of estimating whether poison injections are included in pretraining data, and establishes third-party webpage content as a possible vector for attacking language model pretraining.

Abstract

Poisoning pretraining data can introduce harmful behaviors to LMs that are difficult to detect and mitigate. Prior work on poisoning pretraining data has largely exploited established data sources such as Wikipedia, which do not represent the large scale and heterogeneity typical of pretraining corpora, and has ignored the interaction between poisoned data and data curation pipelines. We demonstrate that poisoning attacks on pretraining data are feasible beyond this limited setting through an existing web-scale content injection mechanism: public discussion interfaces. Additionally, to measure whether malicious content is included after web crawling and data curation, we introduce HalfLife, a novel analysis for estimating adversarial content inclusion in web-crawl based LM training data. We use HalfLife to explore the feasibility of poisoning pretraining corpora at web scale through open discussion interfaces. Our analysis demonstrates the importance of estimating whether poison injections are included in pretraining data, and establishes third-party webpage content as a possible vector for attacking language model pretraining.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

MemCatalyst: Amplifying Data Auditing on Vision-Language Models via Data Poisoning

This work proposes MemCatalyst, a set of data poisoning tools, aiming to amplify the data auditing performance on VLMs, and forces VLMs to over-learn specific inconsistencies between image features and textual semantics during training, thereby increasing their susceptibility to membership information auditing.

Xukun Luan, Jinyan Liu, Yuhui Gong et al. · 0 citations
Jun 2026

Theory of Continual Learning Against Data Poisoning Attacks

Continual learning (CL), where a model is trained on a sequence of data tasks, is increasingly being adopted across key fields such as large language models and image recognition, yet it remains highly vulnerable to data poisoning that triggers learning divergence or severe excess risk. Despite these threats, a principled theoretical foundation in CL for understanding attack and defense remains lacking. In this paper, we develop a theoretical framework to analyze strategic attacks and defenses in regularization-based CL, a cornerstone of recent CL theory. By framing the adversary-defender interaction as an online zero-sum game, we first establish a fundamental performance limit: no defense succeeds when an adversary poisons a linear proportion of tasks by injecting unbounded noise or pattern shifts in regularization-based CL. We then analyze two possibly defensible scenarios: infrequent attacks and bounded noise per attack. For the former regime, we propose a task-to-task verification mechanism to detect data poisoning and reduce cumulative bias for learning convergence. For the latter regime, we derive a robust defense that minimizes the model's sensitivity to poisoned features, provably accelerating the convergence rate. Extensive experiments on realistic tasks further validate our theoretical results.

Yiting Hu, Lingjie Duan · 0 citations
Open access Jun 2026

A Comprehensive Approach to Fake News Detection with Adversarial Training and Model Explainability

1 Abstract —The proliferation of fake news has become a significant challenge in the digital era, with misinformation spreading rapidly across online platforms and social media. This paper explores the application of natural language processing and machine learning techniques to automatically detect and classify fake news articles. Multiple classification models, including traditional algorithms and modern deep learning architectures, were trained and evaluated on a dedicated dataset. To analyze the robustness of these models, adversarial attacks were applied using the TextAttack framework. Such attacks simulate subtle modifications in the input text, exposing potential vulnerabilities that may lead to misclassifications. In addition, explainability techniques such as LIME were employed to interpret model predictions and to better understand the factors influencing decision-making. A web-based application was developed to integrate the trained models into an interactive platform. The system allows users to analyze news articles by either providing the full text or submitting a URL, while administrators have access to model explanations, database management, and retraining functionalities.

Vlad-Constantin Cristescu, Stelian Spinu · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

ToxScreen: Detecting Whether an LLM Has Been Poisoned

As large language models (LLMs) are deployed in high-stakes domains, adversaries may poison training data to implant backdoors: hidden triggers that covertly manipulate model behavior at inference time. We ask whether a defender can recover such a trigger under realistic affordances, namely white-box access to the weights and knowledge of the behavior of concern, but no training data, no trusted reference model, no knowledge of the trigger, and no certainty that the model is poisoned. To evaluate whether a defender can recover such a trigger under realistic settings, we release ToxScreen, a benchmark of roughly 800 backdoored models spanning attack objectives, trigger mechanisms, poisoning rates, model scales, and backdoor training mechanisms. We also assert that the backdoors are high-quality: they achieve high attack success rates, generalize to unseen harmful inputs, and preserve clean-task performance. Scoring recovery of the planted trigger, we find that gradient-based prompt optimization fails in recovery, whereas a token look-up that ranks candidates by attack-success rate recovers the trigger wherever the backdoor is effective. To understand this more, we study the relationship between attack behaviors and the weights of an LLM. We find a phenomenon whereby backdoors operate via different mechanistic strategies than jailbreaks, allowing defenders to filter jailbreaks. Finally, no method reliably surfaces every backdoor, but a broadly jailbreakable model is itself anomalous, a useful signal even when the exact trigger is not recovered. We release all models and evaluation code

A. Hughes, N. Xing, Collin Francel et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Mitigating Backdoors via Decoy Shortcuts and Knowledge Decoupling

Backdoor attacks pose a serious threat to deep neural networks, especially when training relies on third-party data, allowing adversaries to inject malicious behaviors through data poisoning. In this work, we reveal that backdoor behaviors tend to be absorbed by a simpler parallel branch when jointly trained with the main network. Motivated by this insight, we propose Trapping and Removing (TR), a simple yet effective training-time defense that introduces a lightweight shortcut branch as a"honeypot"to trap backdoor knowledge. After training, backdoors can be removed by discarding the shortcut, without requiring any additional data. To further enhance backdoor isolation while maintaining benign performance, we design a knowledge decoupling strategy with entropy-based weight assignment, encouraging poisoned samples to flow through the honeypot while guiding the main network to focus on benign learning. In addition, we introduce an automatic shortcut generation strategy to improve generalization across model architectures. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets and five model architectures demonstrate that our approach effectively mitigates a wide range of backdoor attacks while preserving performance on benign data. Code: https://github.com/Zixuan-Zhu/TR}{github.com/Zixuan-Zhu/TR.

Zixuan Zhu, Rui Wang, Lihua Jing et al. · 0 citations