Skip to content
Conference

KubeTwin 2.0: Demonstrating the Impact of Scheduling Strategies in Kubernetes

Jun 2026 · IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization · pp. 348-350 · 0 citations · 7 references
Computer Science

Abstract

Modern cloud-native applications increasingly rely on Kubernetes to orchestrate large-scale, heterogeneous workloads. However, experimenting with its cluster-level mechanisms in a scalable way, such as its diverse scheduling policies, remains difficult in production environments due to operational costs and limited observability. This demonstration showcases KubeTwin, a practical framework that creates and maintains a live Digital Twin of a Kubernetes cluster. KubeTwin enables the modeling of multi-cluster infrastructures, including edge and cloud nodes, heterogeneous resource capacities, and network latencies, allowing for safe experimentation, debugging, and what-if analysis without disrupting production workloads. Through an interactive demonstration, we show how researchers and developers can leverage KubeTwin to (i) assess the performance of workloads under diverse traffic patterns and (ii) evaluate diverse scheduling strategies under different infrastructure scenarios. The demo highlights how Kubernetes Digital Twins can bridge the gap between simulation and real-world experimentation, providing a powerful tool for both operational decision-making and research prototyping.

View source

Similar papers

Conference Jun 2026

Unveiling the Impact of Scheduling Strategies in Kubernetes with the KubeTwin Platform

Efficient workload scheduling is central to the performance, scalability, and cost-effectiveness of modern clouds. In the most popular cloud platform today, Kubernetes (K8s), the scheduler can be extended with multiple scheduling plugins, enabling fine-grained control over scheduling decisions. However, cloud providers...

José Santos, D. Borsatti, Walter Cerroni et al. · 1 citation
Review Open access Jul 2026

Enhancing the Kubernetes Scheduler: A State-of-the-Art Review from Cloud to Edge

A comprehensive review of Kubernetes scheduling strategies published between January 2023 and January 2026 is presented and a multi-dimensional taxonomy is established that categorizes scheduling approaches based on common objectives, modification methods, optimization methodologies, targeted workloads, evaluation meth...

Mohammed Alhakimi, R. Latip · 0 citations
Conference Jun 2026

An Experimental Evaluation of VPA and in-Place Resource Resizing in Kubernetes Under Dynamic Workloads

Efficient resource management remains a main challenge in Kubernetes, where scaling plays a key role in ensuring that resource provisioning adapts to workload variability. Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA) is the default mechanism in Kubernetes for vertical scaling, but its reliance on evicting pods to apply new resource v...

Hadil Bouasker, Massinissa Ait Aba, Abdenour Yasser Brahmi et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

A Kubernetes Scheduler Plugin for Cluster-Wide Placement Optimisation

The default scheduler of Kubernetes, the state-of-the-art container orchestrator, uses fast, local placement decisions. Unfortunately, this design leads to resource fragmentation, reduced cluster usage, and overprovisioning. External solvers can compute global placement plans, but enforcing these plans in upstream clus...

Henrik Christensen, Saverio Giallorenzo, J. Mauro · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Implementation of the Fremer Model to Optimize Kubernetes Configuration in Concert Ticketing Application Deployment

As digital services evolve, the need for scalable and robust cloud-native applications increases. Kubernetes has become one of the most widely used container orchestration platforms. However, Kubernetes takes a while to react to unexpected surges in workload because its built-in autoscaling method is still reactive. Th...

Ziven Ferdinand, Gladys Jessica Ruslim, Tristan Aaron Hidajat et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Evaluating Kubernetes Progressive Delivery in Constrained Environments Flagger vs. Argo Rollouts

Flagger is recommended for strict resource predictability in threshold-breach environments, while Argo Rollouts is recommended for broader fault-type resilience is operationally critical where broader fault-type resilience is operationally critical.

Gagah Syuja Saka Abdullah, Rama Aria Megantara · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.