2 papers indexed here

Fetches their full publication history.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Conference Jun 2026

KubeTwin 2.0: Demonstrating the Impact of Scheduling Strategies in Kubernetes

Modern cloud-native applications increasingly rely on Kubernetes to orchestrate large-scale, heterogeneous workloads. However, experimenting with its cluster-level mechanisms in a scalable way, such as its diverse scheduling policies, remains difficult in production environments due to operational costs and limited observability. This demonstration showcases KubeTwin, a practical framework that creates and maintains a live Digital Twin of a Kubernetes cluster. KubeTwin enables the modeling of multi-cluster infrastructures, including edge and cloud nodes, heterogeneous resource capacities, and network latencies, allowing for safe experimentation, debugging, and what-if analysis without disrupting production workloads. Through an interactive demonstration, we show how researchers and developers can leverage KubeTwin to (i) assess the performance of workloads under diverse traffic patterns and (ii) evaluate diverse scheduling strategies under different infrastructure scenarios. The demo highlights how Kubernetes Digital Twins can bridge the gap between simulation and real-world experimentation, providing a powerful tool for both operational decision-making and research prototyping.

José Santos, D. Borsatti, Walter Cerroni et al. · 0 citations
Conference Jun 2026

Unveiling the Impact of Scheduling Strategies in Kubernetes with the KubeTwin Platform

Efficient workload scheduling is central to the performance, scalability, and cost-effectiveness of modern clouds. In the most popular cloud platform today, Kubernetes (K8s), the scheduler can be extended with multiple scheduling plugins, enabling fine-grained control over scheduling decisions. However, cloud providers often lack clear insights into the trade-offs of individual placement strategies and resort to combining multiple plugins without a clear rationale. This uncertainty creates a gap in understanding which scheduling configuration yields optimal results for a given application or traffic pattern under specific infrastructure conditions. Thus, this paper investigates the implications of different scheduling strategies in K8s by leveraging KubeTwin (KT), a high-fidelity simulator for the K8s platform designed for reproducible experimentation. This work extended KT with advanced scheduling capabilities to evaluate the impact of single and combined scheduling plugins across diverse workloads and infrastructure conditions, focusing on key aspects such as performance, fairness, and resource utilization. The results highlight that Node-affinity and Diktyo single-purpose plugins consistently outperform multi-objective scheduling combinations, achieving the lowest deployment costs (below 50 price/day), shortest queue times (under 50 ms), and fastest response times (below 200 ms). In contrast, combined strategies, such as Balanced, result in significantly higher costs and higher latency. This study shows that combining multiple optimization criteria within a single scheduling strategy often degrades performance, whereas targeted, single-objective plugins deliver robust and predictable behavior across heterogeneous infrastructures and workload patterns.

José Santos, D. Borsatti, Walter Cerroni et al. · 1 citation