Strong standard-metric performance alone is insufficient to establish robustness after unlearning and motivate adversarial stress-testing as a complementary component of unlearning evaluation, showing a substantial gap between clean-query forgetting and adversarial robustness.
Abstract
Machine unlearning aims to remove the influence of targeted training data from a model while preserving its remaining capabilities, but evaluating whether such information has truly become inaccessible remains challenging. Existing benchmarks primarily assess unlearning under clean, non-adversarial queries, leaving open whether information that appears forgotten can still be recovered through strategic prompting. We address this gap through a unified evaluation of prompt-based and fine-tuning-based unlearning methods on TOFU using Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct, followed by an adversarial robustness evaluation of methods that perform strongly under standard metrics. We introduce Attack Success Rate (ASR), an LLM-as-judge metric that measures the fraction of adversarial responses whose leakage score exceeds $0.2$, and evaluate recovery across eight attack suites. Our results reveal a substantial gap between clean-query forgetting and adversarial robustness. Although several fine-tuning-based methods achieve Forget Quality above $0.91$, targeted information remains recoverable with ASRs between $72.8\%$ and $84.3\%$, close to the $87.5\%$ ASR of the unprotected base model. In contrast, clean multilingual reformulations yield only $2.95\%$ measured leakage. A manual audit further finds agreement between binary ASR decisions and human factual assessments in seven of ten cases, indicating that ASR provides a useful, though imperfect, signal of behavioral recoverability. These findings show that strong standard-metric performance alone is insufficient to establish robustness after unlearning and motivate adversarial stress-testing as a complementary component of unlearning evaluation.
Large Language Models (LLMs) can memorize and reproduce sensitive, copyrighted, or otherwise undesirable training content, creating privacy, safety, and regulatory concerns. Machine unlearning offers a practical alternative to full retraining, but many existing methods apply broad or fixed parameter updates that can degrade utility and remain brittle under deployment changes such as post-training quantization, where forgotten knowledge may partially re-emerge. We propose Forgetting Only What Matters via Unlearning Layers (FOM-UL), a layer-level unlearning framework that selects transformer layers using a forget-to-retain significance score. This score identifies layers with high influence on the forget set and low sensitivity to the retain set, allowing FOM-UL to concentrate updates where they are most effective while leaving most of the model unchanged. This targeted update strategy improves the forgetting-utility trade-off and provides an empirical path toward quantization-resilient unlearning by reducing the chance that small, diffuse updates are erased by low-bit rounding. Across TOFU, KnowUnDo, and MUSE-style evaluations, FOM-UL reduces residual memorization compared with strong GA, NPO, KLD, SURE, ReLearn, and LUNAR-based baselines while preserving retain-set utility close to the vanilla model. Under 8-bit and 4-bit post-training quantization, FOM-UL maintains stronger memorization suppression and utility preservation than competing methods, and adversarial prompt evaluations show lower recovery of forgotten content. Overall, FOM-UL provides an efficient unlearning strategy that improves targeted forgetting, utility preservation, and deployment robustness without claiming formal guarantees of erasure.
Ravi Ranjan, O. Kotevska, Agoritsa Polyzou· 0 citations
This work constructs a benchmark that captures unintended degradation on benign inputs sharing generic patterns with the forget set, and proposes Selective Protection with Anchored Regularization, which protects generic patterns via anchored activation filtering while reinforcing them through entity-abstracted enhancement.
Junxian You, Junkai Chen, Yuhao He et al.· 0 citations
Deepfake detectors remain vulnerable to transfer-based black-box attacks, in which adversarial examples are generated on a source surrogate model and transferred to a target model, unknown to the attacker. Yet how source--target compatibility shapes attack success remains poorly understood. Prior studies evaluate limited detector pools and rarely disentangle architectural from training factors. We conduct a controlled evaluation of adversarial transferability across 60 detectors spanning six backbones, two pretraining regimes, and five training-data configurations, using two attack procedures: AutoAttack (AA) and the Carlini--Wagner attack with Expectation over Transformation (CW--EOT). Matched comparisons reveal significantly higher transfer when source and target share an exact backbone, architecture family, pretraining regime, or training data. This compatibility structure is attack-dependent: exact backbone compatibility has the largest effect under AA, whereas shared pretraining and training data have the largest effects under CW--EOT. When transfer is averaged across non-target sources, mean attack success rate (ASR) is $7.21\%$ under AA and $19.52\%$ under CW--EOT. By contrast, a multi-source oracle combining both attacks attains a \(64.48\%\) mean ASR after excluding exact backbone and training-data matches, showing that source averaging can substantially understate target vulnerability. We release 240,000 adversarially perturbed images, complete pairwise transfer results, detector configurations, and evaluation code. These findings establish source--target compatibility and source-model selection as central dimensions of credible transfer-based black-box robustness evaluation.
Rafael M. Mamede, Pedro C. Neto, A. F. Sequeira· 0 citations
The proposed method improves classification accuracy on clean samples compared to the original IBD, while maintaining similar accuracy on adversarial samples, and is competitive with state-of-the-art approaches, including the recent dual-teacher distillation framework B-MTARD.
Vincent Ryusuke Takahashi, Yoshinari Takeishi, Jun'ichi Takeuchi et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
A failure-aware adversarial retrieval-augmented framework for improving robustness in natural language understanding that combines retrieval, automated validation, contextual-bandit failure selection, and controlled adversarial retraining, enables scalable robustness improvement without additional human annotation.
This paper reveals that samples generated by a well-trained generative model are close to clean ones but far from adversarial ones, and proposes Consistency Model-based Adversarial Purification (CMAP), which optimizes vectors within the latent space of a pre-trained consistency model to generate samples for restoring clean data.
Shuhai Zhang, Jiahao Yang, Hui Luo et al.· IEEE Transactions on Pattern...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
