This work proposes Forgetting Only What Matters via Unlearning Layers (FOM-UL), a layer-level unlearning framework that selects transformer layers using a forget-to-retain significance score and provides an empirical path toward quantization-resilient unlearning.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) can memorize and reproduce sensitive, copyrighted, or otherwise undesirable training content, creating privacy, safety, and regulatory concerns. Machine unlearning offers a practical alternative to full retraining, but many existing methods apply broad or fixed parameter updates that can degrade utility and remain brittle under deployment changes such as post-training quantization, where forgotten knowledge may partially re-emerge. We propose Forgetting Only What Matters via Unlearning Layers (FOM-UL), a layer-level unlearning framework that selects transformer layers using a forget-to-retain significance score. This score identifies layers with high influence on the forget set and low sensitivity to the retain set, allowing FOM-UL to concentrate updates where they are most effective while leaving most of the model unchanged. This targeted update strategy improves the forgetting-utility trade-off and provides an empirical path toward quantization-resilient unlearning by reducing the chance that small, diffuse updates are erased by low-bit rounding. Across TOFU, KnowUnDo, and MUSE-style evaluations, FOM-UL reduces residual memorization compared with strong GA, NPO, KLD, SURE, ReLearn, and LUNAR-based baselines while preserving retain-set utility close to the vanilla model. Under 8-bit and 4-bit post-training quantization, FOM-UL maintains stronger memorization suppression and utility preservation than competing methods, and adversarial prompt evaluations show lower recovery of forgotten content. Overall, FOM-UL provides an efficient unlearning strategy that improves targeted forgetting, utility preservation, and deployment robustness without claiming formal guarantees of erasure.
This work proposes ARIA (autoencoder-gated inference-time unlearning), a test-time unlearning method that leaves model weights intact and gates access to unwanted knowledge only when generation enters a forget-related state and introduces three post-unlearning adversarial attacks targeting weight-space and decoding-spa...
Ping-Zhi Li, Jinhao Duan, Vaishnav Tadiparthi et al.· 0 citations
CONfession-to-Forget-Set (CONFS), a data-blind framework that constructs model-aligned forget sets by eliciting and formalizing the model's memorized knowledge, approaches Gold-standard performance on several metrics and achieves a competitive forgetting-utility balance, while preserving utility better than other data-...
Miso Kim, Georu Lee, Seungwon Jeong et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces ERASE, Erasure via Reconstructive Adversarial Signal Editing, a framework for on-the-go forgetting that suppresses the observable influence of private data without modifying model weights, establishing a scalable, regulation-aligned pathway for continual, privacy-conscious learning.
ADU is presented, a fine-grained, training-based framework that shifts unlearning from token erasure to contextual attention-pathway decoupling, and achieves the strongest aggregate performance among evaluated baselines on the TOFU and WMDP benchmarks.
Xun-Lei Chen, Qi-Rui Ye, Yuang Li et al.· 0 citations
The AdaPop (Adaptive Popularity) method is proposed, which combines local token confidence with a per-fact popularity-dependent exponent derived from an external proxy, and automates the forget-retain balance via a dual-ascent controller that adjusts the retain penalty each epoch.
Anna Borisiuk, A. Savchenko, Alexander Panchenko et al.· 0 citations
A quantization-robust unlearning framework that makes forgetting robust to quantization while maintaining overall model utility is proposed, and a curvature-based criteria that pinpoints sensitive weights in the unlearned model that leads to both non-robust forgetting and reduced utility is revealed.
Jia-Lu Wang, Jia-Ning Deng, Shu-Qing Luo et al.· 1 citation
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.