Skip to content

FactoryNet: A Large-Scale Dataset toward Industrial Time-Series Foundation Models

Jonas Petersen Pratik Jawahar Riccardo Maggioni Alexandre Huou Karim Othman Camilla Mazzoleni Matteo Cozzi Marek Gajewski Davide Paloschi Gian-Alessandro Lombardi Matei C. Ignuta-Ciuncanu Lior Porath Federico Martelli Philipp Christian Petersen
Oct 2026
Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning

Abstract

Industrial machines are actuated systems, yet most open time-series corpora record sensor outcomes alone; the few that do log commanded signals expose them in vendor-specific forms that differ from machine to machine, so commanded intent and measured response cannot be compared across embodiments. We introduce FactoryNet, a pretraining corpus for industrial time-series: 113M datapoints across 57k end-to-end task executions (15k real, 42k synthetic) on seven embodiments and four tasks, with 27 annotated anomaly types alongside healthy baselines and counterfactual pairs. Every signal in every source is mapped into a single control-theoretic schema, Setpoint, Effort, Feedback, Context (S-E-F-C), which expresses any actuated system in a common representational frame and makes commanded-versus-realized dynamics readable as explicit prediction residuals. Using the corpus, we find that a task-phase model trained on simulation, with no real phase labels, recovers roughly two thirds of the real-data ceiling on both robots, and that transfer holds within a robot family but rarely across manufacturers. Fault signatures behave differently: an uncalibrated simulator gives no detectable fault signal on either robot, and aligning the feature distributions does not repair it. What separation there is comes from Effort: motor current distinguishes faults where measured tool motion is close to chance, and calibrating the simulator to reproduce that one channel recovers a payload fault on the real robot. We read this as simulation capturing the stable structure of a task while fault behaviour stays diverse and fault-type specific. We release FactoryNet as a growing, multi-embodiment substrate for industrial foundation models.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.