Skip to content
Preprint

Astar: Learning to Propose Evolution Directions for Self-Evolving Industrial AI Systems

Aug 2026 · 2 citations · 60 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work proposes Astar, a training-based approach that learns a specialized evolution-guiding model from the abundant iteration histories of industrial systems, and proposes a pipeline that turns noisy historical commits into a large, clean evolutionary corpus via pairwise sample expansion and noise filtering.

Abstract

Modern AI systems advance through continuous iteration: a loop of proposing evolution directions, implementing code, training, and evaluation. While the latter three stages are increasingly automated, the starting point --- proposing effective evolution directions --- remains a critical bottleneck that still relies heavily on senior experts. In this work, we explore whether AI can take over this role. We find that general-purpose LLMs, even the advanced GPT-5.5, offer only generic and misaligned suggestions: the required expertise is accumulated through experience rather than explicitly codified, and thus hard to inject directly. To this end, we propose Astar, a training-based approach that learns a specialized evolution-guiding model from the abundant iteration histories of industrial systems. Realizing this idea, however, raises four challenges: sparse supervision, noisy data, a vast direction space, and prohibitively expensive verification. We address them along two fronts. On the data side, we design a pipeline that turns noisy historical commits into a large, clean evolutionary corpus via pairwise sample expansion and noise filtering. On the model side, we train the model through mid-training, SFT, and RL, guiding evolution direction generation with hierarchical hints and using the reward model in RL as a fast surrogate evaluator. Astar has been deployed in Alibaba's Lazada advertising system for evolution direction proposal. Astar-8B achieves a single-proposal success rate of 0.6786 in real-execution evaluation, far exceeding human experts (0.3229) and the strongest general-purpose LLM (0.3071). More importantly, Astar closes the loop and enables fully automatic iteration: it guided 20 consecutive iterations over two weeks, improving offline Hitrate@200 by 23.6%, while an online A/B test yielded relative lifts of 4.86% in GMV and 1.82% in advertising revenue.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Verify Less, Evolve More: Training Idea-Level Critics for Verification-Efficient ML Evolving Agents

As large language models become more powerful, self-evolving agents are able to tackle challenging tasks including AI for machine learning (AI4ML). In AI4ML, while empirical verification is available, it often requires computationally costly model training and evaluation, limiting the speed and scale of agent evolution...

Jiamu Bai, Li-Zhu Zhang, Xin Yu et al. · 0 citations
#reinforcement learning Review Open access Oct 2026

ICoder-27B: Recursive AI-Led Development of Frontier Industrial Coding Model

Recursive AI, the prospect of artificial intelligence taking an increasingly complete role in building and improving artificial intelligence, has so far been demonstrated mostly on small models, bounded tasks, and fixed time budgets. A recent technical report by Yang and colleagues [1] asks a more demanding question: h...

Pratyush Singh · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Evolving in Thought Space: Training a Small Model at Test Time Unlocks Better Discoveries

Open-ended scientific discovery often requires repeatedly proposing and evaluating candidate solutions. LLM-based systems can support this process by generating and refining executable solutions from verifier feedback. Methods such as TTT-Discover use test-time training (TTT) to update the solution-generating LLM from...

Chong-He Jiang, Ao Qu, Si-Yuan Liu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

iCoder-27B: Recursive AI-Led Development of Frontier Industrial Coding Model

The results chart an engineering path toward recursive self-improvement, in which humans distill the principles of model building, agents operationalize them through evidence-driven experimentation, and each generation of AI becomes a more capable architect of the next.

Cheng Yang, Jiayang Lyu, Shang Liu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Frontier Learning: Training LLM Reasoners at the Edge of Capability

Across several reasoning tasks and model families, the proposed frontier learning approach consistently achieves higher relative gains over fixed-pool baselines, demonstrating that effective post-training requires not only selecting useful problems, but continually generating them at the edge of capability.

Robin Faro, S. Ramesh, Ilija Bogunovic et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

How Much of a Harness Does a Strong Agent Need for Autonomous ML Engineering?

Recent autonomous machine learning engineering (MLE) agents have made significant progress on public leaderboards. Often motivated by progress stagnation over long-horizon cycles and limited Large Language Model (LLM) primitives, modern MLE agents are deployed on top of increasingly elaborate machinery: multi-agent orc...

Kirill Brilliantov, Alejandro Hernández-Cano, Emmanuel Abbé · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.