Verification Reward Model for Reinforcement Learning in Chip Design Verification
TL;DR
A Verification Reward Model framework for training language models to create and repair chip verification artifacts, with full UVM capability admitted through feature-specific qualification, and a first experiment on a small, open-tool-compatible benchmark with lightweight models is described.
Abstract
We propose a Verification Reward Model (VRM) framework for training language models to create and repair chip verification artifacts. The central object is a versioned verification contract that binds requirements, permissible stimulus, observation boundaries, reference behavior, evaluation budgets, and acceptance criteria. Compiler, simulator, formal, mutation, coverage, and expert-review evidence are converted into auditable records. Deterministic acceptance checks remain outside the learned model. A learned outcome model predicts expensive future evidence from the specification, the generated artifact, and explicitly masked partial evidence; a semantic critic identifies evidence-supported weaknesses; a deterministic reward composer translates the resulting quality vector into task-conditioned training rewards. Extensions include paired clean/fault interventions, marginal fault-discovery rewards, uncertainty-aware evaluation scheduling, and a quarantined cross-domain learning loop. Evaluation emphasizes independently validated fault detection, false alarms, generalization across design families, and total cost to reach a specified quality level. We describe a first experiment on a small, open-tool-compatible benchmark with lightweight models, with full UVM capability admitted through feature-specific qualification. This is a position paper: we specify the framework and the experiments that would test it, and we report no training, EDA, or silicon results.