Aug 2026· AI Engineering· Vol 2· 0 citations· 36 references
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being incorporated into engineering practices, transforming the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of systems. The present study explores recent peer-reviewed literature on three interwoven aspects of this transformation: ethical governance, societal change, and environmental sustainability. The review covers new governance instruments such as the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act, ISO/IEC 42001, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, as well as explainable-AI (XAI) methods that engineers are increasingly using to explain to regulators, clients, and the public why their safety-critical decisions are made. Also, it addresses the implications of AI on engineering labor markets, professional education and decision-making power, including the differential exposure of high-skill cognitive tasks to automation, and the need for new skills. Furthermore, it considers the dual nature of AI in terms of its contribution to resource optimization, predictive maintenance and integration of renewable energy, and its contribution to an increasing computational carbon and water footprint that can offset these benefits, a tension that is sometimes referred to as the Jevons paradox. The review suggests an integrated framework of responsible AI engineering that connects the three elements of responsible AI: technical explainability, institutional accountability, and life-cycle environmental auditing. The review concludes that long-term acceptability and acceptance of AI in engineering practice will not only be determined by the performance of the models themselves, but also by the ability of the engineering discipline to govern AI transparently, fairly and within planetary limits.
The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, big data analytics, and intelligent industrial systems has accelerated global industrial transformation. While Industry 4.0 emphasised automation and efficiency, concerns regarding inequality, labour displacement, cybersecurity, and environmental sustainability have intensified the need for more human-centred industrial systems. Industry 5.0, therefore, emerges as a sustainable and resilient paradigm integrating technological innovation with human well-being, ethical governance, and environmental responsibility. This study examines the role of AI governance in promoting sustainable industrial transformation within Industry 5.0. A conceptual and integrative literature review approach was adopted using secondary data from peer-reviewed articles, policy reports, and institutional publications. The findings reveal that AI enhances industrial efficiency, predictive maintenance, circular-economy practices, and resilience, while also raising governance and ethical challenges. The study proposes a Human-Centric AI Governance Framework and recommends transparent, ethical, inclusive, and sustainable AI governance systems aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As a conceptual synthesis, the proposed framework has not yet been empirically validated and should therefore be tested in future research across different industrial and institutional contexts.
This study aims to identify the key challenges and development prospects of AI implementation to enhance business efficiency and ensure sustainable development, providing strategic guidance for organizations to balance technological innovation with responsibility and risk management.
Giedrius Čyras, Vita Marytė Janušauskienė· International Scientific Con...· 1 citation
It is argued that ESG frameworks, which evolved through incremental adjustment, may prove insufficient for governing algorithmic systems and proposed adding a fourth pillar, Algorithmic Governance, within an extended ESGA framework to address risks that transcend traditional governance categories.
Pitabas Mohanty, Supriti Mishra· Business Strategy and the En...· 0 citations
An academic adaptation of Patrick Rudolf Dannacher's presentation at the 10th Jakarta Geopolitical Forum 2026 is presented, examining Indonesia's strategic position in the evolving global AI landscape.
Patrick Rudolf Dannacher Dannacher· Proceeding Jakarta Geopoliti...· 1 citation
The HCSAIGF contributes to AI governance research by providing an integrated explanatory architecture and offers a conceptual basis for future empirical research and more coherent governance practices.
Emre İmamoğlu· Journal of Perspectives in M...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.