Aug 2026· Journal of Perspectives in Management· 0 citations
TL;DR
The HCSAIGF contributes to AI governance research by providing an integrated explanatory architecture and offers a conceptual basis for future empirical research and more coherent governance practices.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a transformative socio-technical force, creating significant opportunities while generating complex ethical, societal, and governance challenges. However, existing AI governance research remains fragmented and offers limited integration of technological capabilities, governance mechanisms, human-centered values, and sustainability within a unified framework. To address this gap, this study develops the Human-Centered Sustainable Artificial Intelligence Governance Framework (HCSAIGF) through a systematic literature review and thematic synthesis. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 43 peer-reviewed articles indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection were analyzed using Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis approach. The analysis identified seven descriptive themes: AI capabilities and infrastructure, societal transformation, ethical and societal risks, governance principles, institutional governance mechanisms, human-centered values, and sustainability. Through analytical synthesis, the functional roles and interrelationships of these themes were examined and reconfigured into the HCSAIGF, conceptualizing AI governance as an interconnected system linking technological capabilities, governance challenges, institutional responses, and human-centered and sustainability-oriented outcomes. The framework contributes to AI governance research by providing an integrated explanatory architecture and offers a conceptual basis for future empirical research and more coherent governance practices.
The Anthropological, Spiritual and Civilizational (ASC) Framework is proposed as a diagnostic heuristic for extending trustworthy AI toward dignity, truth, social justice and humane futures, which requires future empirical and expert validation.
Carlos Alberto Echeverría Mayorga, Marta Irene Flores Polanco, José Miguel Esperanza Amaya· Societies· 0 citations
It is argued that ESG frameworks, which evolved through incremental adjustment, may prove insufficient for governing algorithmic systems and proposed adding a fourth pillar, Algorithmic Governance, within an extended ESGA framework to address risks that transcend traditional governance categories.
Pitabas Mohanty, Supriti Mishra· Business Strategy and the En...· 0 citations
Applied to African AI governance domains, this framework reveals how institutional fragmentation, infrastructural dependency, and global platform dominance undermine state-centred regulatory models.
Chijioke I. Okorie· Potchefstroom Electronic Law...· 0 citations
This paper explores how AI risk governance can be effectively integrated into the epistemological and structural foundations of such organizations through the lens of fourth-order cybernetics, and offers a conceptual pathway for resilient and ethically aligned AI implementation in complex organizational environments.
Ludmila Jiříčková, Petr Doucek· International Scientific Con...· 0 citations
An academic adaptation of Patrick Rudolf Dannacher's presentation at the 10th Jakarta Geopolitical Forum 2026 is presented, examining Indonesia's strategic position in the evolving global AI landscape.
Patrick Rudolf Dannacher Dannacher· Proceeding Jakarta Geopoliti...· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.