MagicBench: Diagnosing Visual Agency Loss and Semantic Dependency in Multimodal LLMs

Why Vision Fails as a Universal Bridge: Rectifying Modality Asynchrony in Multilingual MLLMs

Through rigorous mechanistic analysis, this work identifies the Ghost Anchor phenomenon: a temporal modality asynchrony where linguistic translation to the English semantic manifold completes in early layers, while visual semanticization remains immature.

EviAnchor: Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via Regional Visual Evidence Compensation

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) frequently generate content unsupported by visual inputs. Preliminary experiments show that visual evidence is primarily incorporated into answer-side representations in early-to-middle decoder layers, while its direct influence progressively weakens in later layers. This attenuation suggests that visual evidence acquired earlier may be insufficiently utilized during subsequent generation. Based on this observation, we propose EviAnchor, a training-free and single-branch inference framework that preserves and reactivates visual evidence throughout generation. EviAnchor introduces Regional Evidence Anchor (REA) slots to progressively aggregate dense visual tokens into spatially structured representations. It then strengthens the current decision state's access to these visual anchors through decision-conditioned evidence routing, mitigating excessive dependence on textual context. Finally, the model resumes its native Transformer computation to integrate the retrieved visual evidence with question semantics and generation history. Experiments across POPE, CHAIR, and MMHal-Bench demonstrate consistent improvements in visual grounding.

Beyond What Meets the Eye: Unveiling Situational Illusions for Multimodal Large Language Models

Real-world situation appearances can deviate from their underlying physical states, challenging the reliability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in practical applications. In this paper, we term this phenomenon situational illusions and investigate: (1) how MLLMs perform under such illusions, and (2) how to mitigate the limitations. We first develop a comprehensive where-what-how taxonomy that characterizes where situational illusions occur, what targets they take, and how they arise. Building on this taxonomy, we introduce MSIBench, a benchmark designed to assess the discrimination, understanding, and reasoning capabilities of MLLMs under situational illusions. Evaluations of 27 model configurations reveal that current MLLMs are highly vulnerable to these illusions and exhibit 6 typical failure modes related to visual observation, grounding, and reasoning. To mitigate the limitations, we build on the core idea of systematically inspecting and reasoning over visual evidence for contextual understanding, developing prompting for closed-source models and supervised fine-tuning for open-source models, respectively. These two simple yet effective methods improve model performances by 20% at most, suggesting a practical path toward more reliable multimodal perception and reasoning in complex real-world environments.

Silent Failures in Multimodal Agentic Search:A Diagnostic Taxonomy and Cross-Judge Evaluation

From Vision to Language: Investigating Causal Information Flow in Multimodal Decision-Making

Vision-Language Models are commonly evaluated through their final predictions, but understanding whether these decisions are grounded in visual evidence requires tracing how visual information contributes to language-based decisions. With this purpose in mind, we investigate cross-modal information flow in a video-based generative multiple-choice-like setting by applying a layer-wise causal intervention on video-text attention pathways. We target spatial, causal, and temporal visual reasoning. Our results show that visual information is mainly integrated while the model processes the candidate answer options, which serve as the primary textual grounding sites for the final decision. We further show that nouns play an important role as semantic anchors during multimodal enrichment, while verbs are more relevant when temporal relations are processed. Finally, we identify a distinct pattern in temporal reasoning, suggesting that VLMs struggle to reconstruct sequential information across video frames, but we remark that such fragility may also reflect linguistic biases associated with specific temporal expressions used for defining the relation between events within a scene.

Seeing or Knowing? Visual Context Sensitivity in Multimodal Large Language Models

For the coarse attributes the authors study, MLLMs encode the visual evidence but cannot reliably control their reliance on it, indicating that for the coarse attributes they study, MLLMs cannot reliably control their reliance on it.