Skip to content

UI2App: Benchmarking Visual Interaction Inference in Executable Web Application Generation

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.06306 · 0 citations · 37 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

UI2App is the first benchmark targeting interaction inference, the ability to recover application behavior from screenshots alone, without any textual or behavioral guidance, and designs an end-to-end pipeline that evaluates each artifact along four dimensions: executability, navigation reachability, visual fidelity, and interaction inference.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated growing competence in web page generation. However, existing text-driven approaches rely on complex prompts that impose substantial demands on users and offer limited expressivity for page layout and cross-page visual coherence. Image-driven paradigms, which take UI screenshots as input, align more closely with real development workflows. However, current benchmarks focus primarily on visual fidelity and lack a systematic evaluation of the interaction capabilities in generated artifacts. To address this gap, we introduce UI2App, the first benchmark targeting interaction inference, the ability to recover application behavior from screenshots alone, without any textual or behavioral guidance. UI2App comprises 327 screenshots grouped into 45 state-coherent screenshot sets for runnable multi-route web applications. We design an end-to-end pipeline that evaluates each artifact along four dimensions: executability, navigation reachability, visual fidelity, and interaction inference. The interaction metric (IIS) assesses inferred interactions by functional correctness and state-management complexity, crediting any valid implementation rather than matching a single reference. Experiments on six frontier vision-language models reveal a marked capability mismatch between visual reconstruction and interaction realization: the visual-fidelity leader scores only 7.5 on IIS, ranking fourth and trailing the IIS leader by 5.2x. High-complexity interactions such as cross-page state remain a pervasive bottleneck, with half of the evaluated models scoring exactly zero on this dimension. Overall, the results indicate that inferring complete interaction behavior from static screenshots remains a key challenge for models.

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

MV-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Coordinated Multi-View Interface Construction

It is shown that current MLLMs can reproduce visual appearance but remain limited in generating the data semantics and interactive logic required by coordinated multi-view interfaces, and Iterative refinement improves code executability but does not substantially reduce the gap in data binding and interaction generation.

Yue Zhao, Hongxu Liu, Feiyu Wang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

CAP: A Scalable Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-Site Browser Agents with Complex Actions and Perception

CAP is introduced, a scalable benchmark for evaluating browser agents on cross-site, human-like web tasks that require non-trivial UI interactions and visual understanding and a decomposition-and-recomposition pipeline that first abstracts each website into a structured site card capturing user-facing functions, complex execution operations, and perceptual requirements, and then recomposes these components into realistic cross-site workflows.

Zejun Xu, Taiyi Chen, Jin Li et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Rendering-in-the-Loop: An Execution-Driven Agent for Interactive Web Development

Multimodal large language models have achieved remarkable progress in front-end web development, generating interactive webpages from multimodal references such as screenshots and interaction videos. However, existing work largely emphasizes visual metrics such as aesthetics and layout similarity, while overlooking the more critical validation of interactive functionality. We present RILA, an execution-driven agent that puts browser rendering in the loop, iteratively editing generated code from runtime interaction feedback. RILA introduces an Action Interaction Verification (AIV) module that replays the reference interaction trajectory on the generated webpage to collect grounded execution-aware observations, and an Execution-aware Rendering Score (ERS) that jointly measures interaction correctness and visual fidelity to guide iterative optimization. We further build an execution-verified data synthesis pipeline that produces diverse, high-quality training data, offering gains complementary to inference-time optimization. On IWR-Bench, RILA consistently improves both interaction and visual fidelity across foundation models. Notably, with our training pipeline, RILA lifts the compact Qwen3.5-9B backbone from 40.40% to 57.52%, surpassing far larger one-shot generators, including the 1T-parameter Kimi-K2.6 (55.61%) and the proprietary GPT-5.5 (55.74%).

Yi-Long Guo, Hanck Chen, Zi-Xiao Ye et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

VisualRepair: Dynamic Tool Calling and Region Focusing for Visual Software Issue Repair

VisualRepair is proposed, an MLLM-based framework for visual software issue repair comprising two core modules: Image Type-aware Tool Calling (ITTC), which classifies input images and dynamically invokes a tailored tool-calling chain for robust visual interpretation, and Dynamic Test-time Region Focusing (DTRF), which grounds multiple bug-related region candidates and refines them via an adaptive zoom-in and zoom-out strategy to improve fault localization and promote diverse patch generation.

Jingyu Xiao, Zhongyi Zhang, Haoran Hou et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

EvoGenUI-Bench: Evaluating LLMs as Multi-Turn Generative UI Assistants

Large language models can generate interactive web interfaces, but reliable generative UI requires maintaining an executable artifact as user requests evolve. We introduce EvoGenUI-Bench, a benchmark for multi-turn interface maintenance comprising 150 five-turn tasks and 750 turns across three scenarios: information presentation, executable interaction, and tool-grounded external state. We execute generated artifacts in a browser and evaluate them using screenshots, source and DOM evidence, actor traces, and runtime logs. Beyond turn-level and episode-level success, we measure cross-turn retention with Adjacent Pass Retention. Across eight models, even the strongest achieves 74.9% Turn Pass while completing only 37.3% of five-turn episodes; APR further falls to 52.4% on tool-grounded tasks. Diagnostic analysis shows that presentation failures center on information architecture, interaction failures on derived-state propagation and affordance binding, and tool-grounded failures additionally involve external-state grounding and requirement decomposition. These results reframe generative UI evaluation from judging isolated outputs to testing whether interface behavior, derived state, external state, and assistant claims remain synchronized as the artifact evolves.

Yue Peng, Lan-Ke Xia, Zi-Han Wang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.