Oct 2026· Journal of Clinical Medicine· Vol 15, pp. 7639· 0 citations· 22 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Clinical and molecular factors may help identify particularly vulnerable patients at diagnosis, supporting individualized treatment planning and shared decision-making, and external validation in larger multicenter cohorts is warranted.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Patients with unresectable glioblastoma (GBM) undergoing biopsy alone represent a clinically heterogeneous population with poor survival and limited access to standard oncological treatment. We investigated clinical, radiological, and histomolecular factors associated with early mortality after biopsy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 93 consecutive cases of patients with IDH-wildtype GBM who underwent biopsy without tumor resection between 2013 and 2025. Early death was defined as death within three months of biopsy. Baseline clinical, radiological, and molecular variables were evaluated using univariable analyses and exploratory multivariable logistic regression. Results: Median overall survival was 3 months, and 48/89 patients with available survival data (53.9%) died within three months. Preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and MGMT promoter methylation status (available for 71/93 patients) were nominally associated with early mortality in univariable analyses, although these associations did not remain significant after FDR correction. Age was not significant in univariable analysis but was associated with early mortality after adjustment in the exploratory multivariable model based on 62 complete cases. Conventional radiological parameters showed no consistent association with early death. Exploratory analysis suggested a high-risk phenotype combining KPS ≤ 60 and FLAIR signal crossing the midline. Overall, 23/93 patients (24.7%) did not initiate any adjuvant treatment, while only 17/93 (18.3%) completed the Stupp regimen. Conclusions: Early mortality is frequent in biopsy-only GBM. Clinical and molecular factors may help identify particularly vulnerable patients at diagnosis, supporting individualized treatment planning and shared decision-making. External validation in larger multicenter cohorts is warranted.
Glioblastoma (GBM) carries a poor prognosis, and older patients and those with impaired performance status are often underrepresented in randomized trials. This study evaluated real-world treatment patterns, survival outcomes, and factors associated with outcome in older patients with GBM. We retrospectively analyzed 6...
J. Müller, Ian Schirrwagen, Clara Pitzschel et al.· BMC Geriatrics· 0 citations
Initial univariable screening showed that survival was significantly linked to factors such as patient age, gender, adjuvant therapies, and KPS measured at different perioperative stages, which showed that survival was significantly linked to factors such as patient age, gender, adjuvant therapies, and KPS measured at...
M. O. Özateş, Kadir Çetinkaya, Yaşar Ünsal et al.· Medical Journal of Western B...· 0 citations
This real-world CUP cohort shows patients with favorable risk groups have better survival outcomes than unfavorable risk groups, with survival comparable to specialized international series.
L. Thongthieang· Journal of the Medical Assoc...· 0 citations
In this cohort, neither extent of resection nor adjuvant radiotherapy reached a statistically significant improvement in overall survival, whereas both were associated with delayed tumor recurrence.
Y. Miao, Hai-Bin Wan, Xin-Yan Zhao et al.· Frontiers in Surgery· 0 citations
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumour in adults, associated with poor prognosis despite multimodal therapy. This retrospective study evaluates the impact of and the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with GBM.
A retrospective review of 231 patients diagnosed with GBM at Velindre...
Harriet Hebbes, Sara Walters, J. Powell et al.· Neuro-Oncology· 0 citations
Findings highlight the importance of considering clinical and pathological features in the management and prognosis of RCC patients and highlight the importance of considering clinical and pathological features in the management and prognosis of patients diagnosed with malignant renal tumors.
Mohammad Sadri, S. Masudi, S. Farshid et al.· Caspian Journal of Internal...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.