Aug 2026· Medical Journal of Western Black Sea· 0 citations· 18 references
TL;DR
Initial univariable screening showed that survival was significantly linked to factors such as patient age, gender, adjuvant therapies, and KPS measured at different perioperative stages, which showed that survival was significantly linked to factors such as patient age, gender, adjuvant therapies, and KPS measured at different perioperative stages.
Abstract
Aim: Brain metastases (BM) are an increasing oncological challenge due to improved systemic cancer survival. Surgical resection is essential for symptom control and diagnosis; however, survival outcomes remain heterogeneous. The objective of the current investigation was to evaluate the clinical and surgical determinants that impact overall survival (OS) outcomes in a cohort of patients undergoing resection for BM.Material and Methods: A total of 158 adult cases treated surgically for intracranial metastases from January 2018 to December 2024 were systematically analyzed through a retrospective institutional review. Demographic, clinical, radiological, and surgical variables were analyzed. OS was the primary endpoint. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized for survival estimation, while the influence of various covariates on prognosis was examined through Cox proportional hazards modeling. The Tarone-Ware test was used to assess early survival differences. Results: Our analysis revealed a median survival time of 6.0 months. Initial univariable screening showed that survival was significantly linked to factors such as patient age, gender, adjuvant therapies, and KPS measured at different perioperative stages. In the revised multivariable analysis, postoperative KPS (HR: 0.974, 95% CI: 0.962-0.986, p
Simple Summary Brain metastases are among the most common intracranial tumors in adults, and outcomes after surgical treatment vary considerably among patients. This retrospective study analyzed 378 consecutive adults who underwent resection of histologically confirmed brain metastases at Bagdasar-Arseni Clinical Emerg...
Dan M. Visarion, Ioana Petrescu, V. Prună et al.· Cancers· 0 citations
Objective This study evaluated the effect of local-regional management of the primary tumor on the prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The primary outcome measure was overall survival, while progression-free survival was assessed as a secondary end-point. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyz...
Eray Balcı, A. S. Maden, Mehmet Ali Eryılmaz· European Journal of Breast H...· 0 citations
The number of metastases and the presence of a pathologic fracture are key prognostic factors affecting survival in patients with bone metastasis and may be useful for risk stratification and personalized treatment.
M. Vorobchuk, A. Burlaka, A. Diedkov· Experimental oncology· 0 citations
It is found that overall preoperative performance and biological markers, remains a key predictor of survival, while neurological status, disease spread and spinal instability have no impact than in long‐term survival.
Leonardo Olijnyk, Vivian Huong Hoang Thien Le, Edisond Florial et al.· International Journal of Bre...· 0 citations
In this cohort, neither extent of resection nor adjuvant radiotherapy reached a statistically significant improvement in overall survival, whereas both were associated with delayed tumor recurrence.
Y. Miao, Hai-Bin Wan, Xin-Yan Zhao et al.· Frontiers in Surgery· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
The prognostic significance of the interval between initial cancer diagnosis and development of femoral metastasis requiring surgery remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between this interval and overall survival in patients undergoing surgery for metastatic femoral lesions.
METHODS
A retr...
Mojahed Sakhnini, O. Hershkovich, R. Lotan et al.· European Journal of Surgical...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.