Skip to content
Preprint

Naive Prompt Optimization: Rethinking the Need for Complex Prompt Search

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 35 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

In interactive games, NPO remains broadly competitive with GEPA, while GRPO performs better on some tasks less amenable to prompt optimization.

Abstract

Efficiently improving autonomous agents across diverse tasks is central to accelerating recursive self-improvement (RSI) in agentic AI, with prompt optimization emerging as a promising approach capable of delivering performance gains comparable to those achieved by fine-tuning model weights, while reducing computational costs in both optimization and serving. However, recent developments increasingly favor unnecessarily complex prompt optimizers. We introduce Naive Prompt Optimization (NPO), a lightweight single-lineage method that iteratively revises prompts using a teacher model with rollout feedback. NPO achieves comparable or better performance than GEPA with fewer rollouts, and its advantage increases with stronger teacher models, suggesting that stronger teacher reasoning can partially substitute for optimizer-side search complexity. In interactive games, NPO remains broadly competitive with GEPA, while GRPO performs better on some tasks less amenable to prompt optimization. We also show that NPO-optimized prompts elicit similar performance improvements when applied verbatim to other student models, especially across models within the same family. Overall, our preliminary results show that simple, linear prompt optimization can rival substantially more sophisticated and complex search procedures.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

RLMOpt: Adaptive Prompt Optimization via Recursive Language Models

RLMOpt is introduced, a prompt optimizer that makes the search policy itself language-model-driven through a recursive language model (RLM), which operates over a tool-based environment, inspecting task information, analyzing failures, generating candidates, allocating evaluation budget, and deciding when to stop.

Subhash Bangalore Satheesha, Nirvik Pande, Deepthi Duddempudi et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

TAPR: Enhancing LLM Performance with a Task-Aware Prompt Rewriter

This work introduces a Task-Aware Prompt Rewriter (TAPR), a model that reformulates user prompts into task-optimized prompts with the explicit goal of improving downstream LLM performance.

Oliver Savolainen, E. Bastianelli, H. Azarbonyad · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

CAPO: Constraint-Aware Prompt Optimization for LLM Agents

This work introduces CAPO (Constraint-Aware Prompt Optimization), a primal-dual method that combines pool-based rewrites with adaptive constraint weighting to optimize system prompts under explicit operational constraints.

Victor Ye Dong, Reid Pryzant, Yi Liu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Rethinking Self-Evolving Agents: Do We Still Need Prescribed Optimization Pipelines?

This work introduces Open-Ended Optimization (OEO), which keeps the objective, permitted interactions, resource budget, data boundary, and evaluation fixed while allowing the optimizer to compose the improvement process online.

Xue Hui, Fan Yang · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

When and What to Teach: Budget-Aware Online Adaptation for Web Agents

Web agents have achieved significant success in automating complex internet tasks but deploying them in real-world environments requires continuous online adaptation. Given that deploying powerful proprietary models remains commercially cost-prohibitive, practitioners must rely on lightweight local models that evolve post-deployment via online teaching from a stronger teacher. However, standard interactive feedback imposes prohibitive costs. We show that conventional trajectory-level preference optimization wastes budget on both unresolvable episodes and redundant execution turns. To resolve these inefficiencies, we propose \textbf{Score-Guided Online Teaching with Budgeted Trajectory Trimming}, a budget-aware framework that systematically orchestrates \textbf{when} and \textbf{what} to teach. Specifically, our framework integrates a solvability-aware teacher gate to dictate \textbf{when} to query the teacher model and a score-guided turn selection mechanism to decide \textbf{what} informative turns to retain. Extensive experiments on MiniWoB and TimeWarp demonstrate that our method achieves comparable first-pass success while reducing teacher calls by 22.6\% and student training compute by 52.1\% on average. Our code is available at https://github.com/zjw131f1fc/budgeted-online-teaching.

Jianwei Zhang, Sihan Cao, Pengcheng Zheng et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.