Skip to content
#data science #explainable ai Review Open access

Agentic AI Systems: A Review of Multi-Agent Reasoning, Trust, Orchestration, and Autonomous Data Science

Oct 2026 · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · 0 citations

TL;DR

This review synthesizes four recent studies spanning these strands, together with the broader literature on multi-agent orchestration, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), large-language-model (LLM)-based knowledge-graph construction, and explainable AI, to build a unified picture of agentic AI as applied to intelligent data science.

Abstract

Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) — systems of autonomous, goal-directed software agents that plan, act, and coordinate with reduced human oversight — is moving from research prototypes toward applied data-science, perception, and decision-support pipelines. Yet the literature remains fragmented across largely disconnected strands: trust-aware orchestration of multimodal agents for visual classification, human adoption of autonomous AI agents, automated machine-learning (AutoML) pipelines for tabular data, and fully autonomous multi-agent systems for end-to-end data engineering. This review synthesizes four recent studies spanning these strands, together with the broader literature on multi-agent orchestration, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), large-language-model (LLM)-based knowledge-graph construction, and explainable AI, to build a unified picture of agentic AI as applied to intelligent data science. We propose a four-part taxonomy — perception-level trust orchestration, human adoption of agentic systems, automated feature/model pipelines, and autonomous data-engineering agents — and compare the reviewed studies on automation level, reasoning mechanism, knowledge representation, retrieval use, trust treatment, and evaluation methodology. The synthesis shows that individual components of an agentic data-science stack (confidence calibration, retrieval-grounded re-evaluation, automated feature synthesis, autonomous pipeline repair) have each demonstrated measurable gains in isolation, but no reviewed system couples them with a persistent, multimodal knowledge-graph layer, and adoption research indicates that user trust is not the dominant driver of usage intention — a finding with direct design implications. We identify recurring gaps in provenance, explainability, benchmark standardization, and graph-grounded reasoning, and outline an integrated conceptual framework for the reviewed research landscape, positioning closer integration of agentic data science with knowledge-graph representation as an open research trajectory rather than a solved problem.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.