Nov 2026· IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing· Vol 25, pp. 20612-20624· 0 citations· 33 references
Abstract
Multi-UAV networks are promising for supporting time-sensitive IoT applications, yet most existing studies focus on a single service type and fail to address the coexistence of heterogeneous tasks with fundamentally different timeliness and resource characteristics. In hybrid MEC–DC systems, data collection (DC) and mobile edge computing (MEC) tasks exhibit distinct age of information (AoI) evolution rules and computation–communication couplings, which makes the AoI-aware joint optimization of trajectory planning, task scheduling, and service mode selection under energy, mobility, and communication constraints highly challenging. To tackle these challenges, we propose an adaptive mode-switching multi-agent reinforcement learning framework (AMS-MARL) based on heterogeneous-agent proximal policy optimization (HAPPO). Specifically, a randomized agent update order is employed to decompose the joint advantage into sequential individual advantages, enabling stable and decentralized learning. In addition, a rank-based adaptive reward shaping mechanism is designed to balance information freshness across heterogeneous sensor nodes (SNs) by adjusting reward weights based on AoI deviation from the global average. Extensive simulations under diverse spatial distributions, task ratios, and packet sizes show that AMS-MARL consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in reducing AoI and exhibits strong robustness across varying system settings.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.