Jul 2026· Advances in Materials· pp.
e74058
· 0 citations· 58 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The intrinsic trade-off between therapeutic durability and biosafety across distinct delivery platforms is discussed, along with the necessity that their clinical translation hinges on systematic optimization of delivery precision, immune compatibility, and expression controllability.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) immune cell therapy has emerged as a cornerstone of modern cell-based medicine, demonstrating potent clinical efficacy against a range of malignant tumors and autoimmune diseases. Nevertheless, conventional ex vivo CAR immune cell manufacturing is hindered by complexity, high costs, and significant inter-individual variability, which have limited its broad clinical application. These bottlenecks have prompted a paradigm shift toward in vivo CAR engineering, wherein nanocarriers directly deliver genetic material to circulating or tissue-resident immune cells, substantially simplifying the production process. This review first outlines the evolution of CAR immune cell therapy and key limitations of ex vivo approaches and then examines major delivery platforms for in vivo approaches. Comparative analyses are presented across delivery efficiency, cellular tropism, and expression kinetics, with particular emphasis on delineating the mechanistic distinctions and application boundaries between transient and durable expression strategies. We further dissect the critical challenges, including receptor-mediated non-specific immune activation, nanocarrier-associated immunogenicity constraining repeated administration, and delivery barriers imposed by the solid tumor microenvironment. Finally, the intrinsic trade-off between therapeutic durability and biosafety across distinct delivery platforms is discussed, along with the necessity that their clinical translation hinges on systematic optimization of delivery precision, immune compatibility, and expression controllability.
Nonviral NPs are poised to redefine CAR therapy by enabling scalable, off-the-shelf immune interventions for cancer, autoimmune, and fibrotic diseases.
Ke Huang, Hao Wang, Tao Zhu et al.· Biomaterials· 1 citation
The integration of rational material design, high-throughput screening, artificial intelligence, and interdisciplinary collaboration will be essential to advance next-generation targeted in vivo mRNA cell therapies toward clinical translation.
Danyang Wang, Yumin Li, Jinfeng Deng et al.· Drug Delivery· 0 citations
This review aims to provide actionable guidance to bench-side cell engineering to broad clinical applications by comprehensively discussing recent advancements in LNP formulation and next-generation RNA payload engineering.
Yongjoo Byeon, Nuoya Peng, Eun Bee Oh et al.· Journal of Controlled Releas...· 0 citations
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of several hematological malignancies, but its broader application remains constrained by the complexity, cost, and time required for conventional ex vivo manufacturing.
In vivo
CAR T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising next-generation strategy that aims to generate CAR T cells directly within the patient through targeted delivery of CAR-encoding genetic information to endogenous T cells. This approach has the potential to simplify treatment workflows, shorten manufacturing timelines, reduce production costs, and improve the accessibility of CAR-based immunotherapy. In this review, we summarize the conceptual evolution from ex vivo to
in vivo
CAR T-cell therapy and discuss major delivery platforms for
in vivo
CAR T-cell generation, including engineered lentiviral vectors (LVs), adeno-associated viral vectors, lipid nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, extracellular vesicles, and fusogenic nanovesicles. We further examine key translational challenges and corresponding optimization strategies, including approaches to improve T-cell targeting specificity and delivery controllability, reduce vector immunogenicity, enhance CAR expression persistence, mitigate safety concerns associated with ectopic transduction or genomic integration, and potentially overcome the physical, antigenic, and immunosuppressive barriers encountered in solid tumors. Finally, we summarize early clinical trial progress and discuss future directions for improving the safety, efficacy, and translational potential of
in vivo
CAR T-cell therapy. Overall,
in vivo
CAR T-cell therapy represents an important extension of adoptive cell therapy and may reshape the development and clinical implementation of cell-based immunotherapies.
This review highlights key engineering strategies enabling in vivo CAR T-cell generation, summarizes emerging clinical research and development, and discusses future opportunities for expanding in vivo CAR T-cell therapies as scalable immunotherapy platforms.
Janani Gopalakrishnan, B. Rathod, Sachin Puri· International Immunopharmaco...· 0 citations
This review article focuses on CAR-T cell bioengineering, antitumor mechanism of action, challenges and limitations, as well as the latest innovative nanotechnological solutions for complementing CAR-T cell immunotherapy.
Alaa Ibrahim, Maha Nasr· Biochimica et biophysica act...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.