Skip to content

Artificial intelligence in wastewater treatment: critical review of predictive performance, explainability and deployment readiness

Oct 2026 · Water Practice & Technology · 46 references
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis

Abstract

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly adopted in wastewater treatment to support soft sensing, effluent prediction, nutrient removal assessment, membrane monitoring, anomaly detection, greenhouse-gas emission modeling, and anaerobic digestion optimization. This critical review synthesizes approximately 50 primary studies and benchmark contributions, structured around four analytical dimensions: operational purpose, modeling paradigm, reporting discipline, and deployment readiness. The literature is heavily concentrated in prediction-oriented applications, particularly effluent quality forecasting and membrane fouling assessment, while AI applications in anaerobic digestion, greenhouse-gas modeling, and constructed wetlands remain comparatively limited. Explainable AI is emerging as a mechanism for strengthening model interpretability and engineering credibility, although its application remains selective and methodologically inconsistent. Recent advances in transformer architectures, transfer learning, federated learning, and digital twin frameworks indicate growing methodological maturity, yet practical implementation remains constrained by deficiencies in data quality, sensor reliability, benchmarking practices, governance frameworks, and cybersecurity preparedness. The environmental burden of AI itself, including energy consumption, water demand, and hardware lifecycle emissions, remains insufficiently considered. The principal challenge extends beyond algorithm selection to developing AI systems that are reliable, transparent, accountable, and operationally deployable. Future progress will require deployment-oriented validation, uncertainty-aware modeling, and closer integration with process knowledge and regulatory outcomes.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Apr 2020

ECCOLA - a Method for Implementing Ethically Aligned AI Systems

The method, ECCOLA, is presented, which aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.

Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson · 64 citations · ⚡6
#computer vision Review Apr 2024

AI-powered Code Review with LLMs: Early Results

The goal is to not only refine the accuracy of the LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.

Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem et al. · 62 citations · ⚡3

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

GPT-Lab Aug 28, 2026

We built an AI factory for HVAC control

What does it take to trust AI-driven HVAC optimization? Our AI Model Factory combines agents, machine learning, reinforcement learning and deterministic checks in a governed workflow designed for messy, real-world building data. The post We built an AI factory for HVAC control appeared first on GPT-Lab.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.