Skip to content

Puanlama Yöntemleri

Oct 2026
Educational Technology and Assessment

Abstract

This chapter examines scoring methods used in educational assessment from an epistemological perspective that focuses on how scores are generated. Accordingly, the methods are organized into three main categories: process-based scoring approaches, automated scoring, and comparative judgement. The first section discusses manual and digital scoring, dichotomous and partial-credit scoring, and weighted scoring approaches in terms of their applications, advantages, limitations, and psychometric properties. It also examines how scoring procedures vary according to the purpose of assessment, the construct being measured, and the conditions under which the assessment is administered. The second section explains the historical development of automated scoring systems, tracing their evolution from traditional rule-based and feature-based models to deep learning and generative artificial intelligence-based approaches. It summarizes the operating principles of rule-based, machine learning, neural network, and ontology-based methods, and discusses the roles of CNN, LSTM, and Transformer architectures in the evaluation of written performances. The opportunities provided by large language models for automated scoring are examined within the context of zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning approaches. In addition, the chapter discusses the metrics used to evaluate automated scoring performance —particularly the QWK — and the limitations associated with interpreting these metrics. The final section introduces the comparative judgement approach to scoring and explains its theoretical foundations as an alternative to absolute scoring, in which performances are evaluated through pairwise comparisons. Overall, the chapter provides a comprehensive perspective on contemporary scoring methods, ranging from traditional human scoring to AI-assisted systems and comparative judgement approaches. It offers both a theoretical and practical framework for selecting appropriate scoring methods for different assessment purposes and implementation contexts.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Apr 2020

ECCOLA - a Method for Implementing Ethically Aligned AI Systems

The method, ECCOLA, is presented, which aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.

Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson · 64 citations · ⚡6
#computer vision Review Apr 2024

AI-powered Code Review with LLMs: Early Results

The goal is to not only refine the accuracy of the LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.

Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem et al. · 62 citations · ⚡3
#computer vision Open access Mar 2024

LLM-based agents for automating the enhancement of user story quality: An early report

The use of large language models to automatically improve the user story quality in Austrian Post Group IT agile teams is explored, with a reference model for an Autonomous LLM-based Agent System developed and implemented at the company.

Zheying Zhang, M. Rayhan, Tomas Herda et al. · 48 citations · ⚡4
#computer vision Review Mar 2024

System for systematic literature review using multiple AI agents: Concept and an empirical evaluation

This paper introduces a novel multi-AI-agent system designed to fully automate SLRs, and demonstrates how it substantially reduces the time and effort traditionally required for SLRs while maintaining comprehensiveness and precision.

Abdul Malik Sami, Z. Rasheed, Kai-Kristian Kemell et al. · 44 citations · ⚡2
#computer vision Feb 2024

Can Large Language Models Serve as Data Analysts? A Multi-Agent Assisted Approach for Qualitative Data Analysis

The proposed LLM-based multi-agent system automates qualitative data analysis process, creating opportunities for researchers and practitioners, and future improvements focus on enhancing multilingual performance and integrating continuous expert feedback.

Z. Rasheed, Muhammad Waseem, Aakash Ahmad et al. · 41 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.