Refusal-Calibrated Group Relative Policy Optimization (RC-GRPO) is proposed, a calibrated RL strategy that strengthens the refusal ability of MLLMs while preserving localization performance, and enforces"None" outputs in rollouts for valid advantage estimation on negative samples and applies a penalty to prevent over-refusal on positives, achieving a balanced trade-off between accuracy and reliability.
Abstract
We tackle the challenging yet underexplored task of Generalized Referring Expression Comprehension (GREC), which requires a model to localize the object described by a textual expression when it exists (positive sample) and to refuse output when it does not (negative sample). Although Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel at localizing existing objects, they often fail to reject nonexistent ones due to the absence of negative samples during training, producing hallucinated bounding boxes. Existing post-training approaches such as supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) enhance refusal behavior but usually degrade localization accuracy on positive samples, undermining the model's core competence. To address this, we propose Refusal-Calibrated Group Relative Policy Optimization (RC-GRPO), a calibrated RL strategy that strengthens the refusal ability of MLLMs while preserving localization performance. It enforces"None"outputs in rollouts for valid advantage estimation on negative samples and applies a penalty to prevent over-refusal on positives, achieving a balanced trade-off between accuracy and reliability. A second-stage reasoning reinforcement further consolidates causal understanding and interpretability. Experiments on three GREC benchmarks demonstrate that RC-GRPO attains superior localization accuracy while maintaining strong refusal capability.
It is shown that instruction-tuned models generate answers even when explicitly prompted to refuse when the answer is not supported by the documents, and Reward Shaping for Refusal and Reasoning (RSRR), a reinforcement learning framework that teaches LMs to reason step-by-step over multiple documents, is introduced.
Thilina C. Rajapakse, M. de Rijke· Annual International ACM SIG...· 0 citations
Experiments show that knowledge-aligned SFT can reduce factual hallucinations on WildHalu and Biography while largely preserving general capabilities and confirm that SFT targets beyond the base model's knowledge drive hallucination behavior.
AR Becker, Jakob Kemmler, David Thulke et al.· 0 citations
Large language models often answer structurally unanswerable questions, such as computing cot(-540{\deg}) or evaluating (1).startswith("1"), instead of abstaining. We ask whether this failure reflects missing recognition or failed routing from recognition to abstention. Across instruction-tuned models from 1.7B to 70B parameters, a single linear direction in the hidden state separates answerable from structurally impossible math and code prompts, showing that models represent impossibility before generation. Yet this recognition direction is nearly orthogonal to the canonical safety-refusal direction that mediates trained harmful-content refusal. An in-domain behavior-defined invalidity-aware direction is closer to recognition, but only partially aligned with it, and remains near-orthogonal to safety refusal. Generation-time steering along the recognition direction changes invalidity-aware behavior bidirectionally and dose-responsively on structural math and code cells, while random directions do not. Base/instruct comparisons further show that the low-cosine geometry is already present at the pretraining endpoint. The confident-on-impossible failure is therefore better explained as a routing failure than as an encoding failure: the model has a usable"no admissible answer"signal, but the safety-refusal pathway is not aligned to use it.
It is found that, in this benchmark, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) provides a strong baseline, substantially improving argument language consistency and end-to-end function call accuracy and, under consistent model selection, SFT achieves performance comparable to, and sometimes exceeding more complex reinforcement learning (RL) approaches.
Siddharth Chauhan, Thomas Butler, Abhishek Singhania et al.· 0 citations
RAG has become the de facto method for incorporating new, corpus-specific knowledge into an instruction following LLM (Instruct LLM). Although RAG-based prompting improves factual grounding, it fails when retrieval is incorrect or incomplete, leading to hallucinations. Finetuning methods such as RAFT and PA-RAG enhance RAG by injecting new knowledge into the model's parameters, but require generating a massive amount of synthetic QA that covers the entire corpus. Extended Pre-Training (EPT) on the text corpus avoids the need for comprehensive synthetic data generation but compromises an Instruct LLM's instruction-following capabilities, necessitating instruction fine-tuning (IFT) after pre-training. However, IFT is costly and may be infeasible due to the unavailability of an instruction-tuning corpus. In this work, we propose DKL-Decoupled Knowledge Learning for Instruction-Tuned Language Models. Instead of doing EPT on the Instruct LLM, DKL performs EPT on its corresponding base LLM to infuse new knowledge. These knowledge infused weights are then merged with the Instruct LLM, imparting new knowledge without affecting their instruction-following capabilities. DKL is a lightweight method that avoids expensive instruction fine-tuning and relies on model merging to infuse the new knowledge into the Instruct LLM without destroying its instruction following capabilities. Empirical results show that DKL improves RAG accuracy from 54.17 to 79.26 on retrieval failure cases, while outperforming prior approaches with substantially less training data.
Kushagra Bhushan, Meghanadh Pulivarthi, Sai Krishna Reddy Sathi et al.· 0 citations
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can assign similar confidence to answers that fail for different reasons. We propose HalluPrism, a behavioral diagnostic that re-runs an answer after visual degradation, blank-image replacement, and grounding or relation checks. These targeted probes yield a signature over visual-perturbation sensitivity (V ), image-removal confidence retention (L), and grounding/relation-probe instability (A). Across 58K+ examples from four benchmarks and four MLLMs, image-removal confidence retention is most prevalent, while grounding/relation-probe instability better separates failure families. Only 18 of 48 source-target checks are diagonally aligned, so the coordinates should be interpreted jointly rather than as independent causal sources. With the dataset fixed, the joint signature improves failure-family AUROC from 0.634 to 0.769 on HallusionBench and from 0.707 to 0.817 on VizWiz, with smaller gains on POPE and VSR. In pooled XGBoost analysis, AUROC rises from 0.78 with scalar confidence to 0.95 with (V, L, A) and 0.97 when confidence is added. The same signature does not automatically improve correctness ranking. The three tested direct scalarizations can harm it. These results separate failure diagnosis from abstention scoring: multimodal uncertainty should characterize failure structure before it is used to decide whether to abstain or correct.
Aman Prakash, Sourish Dasgupta, Tanmoy Chakraborty· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
