This study identifies and analyze five LLM-specific frameworks and examines how these frameworks and techniques are adopted individually and in combination, how adoption varies across categories of LLMs, and how repositories differ in intent, focus, use case, and architectural design.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are integrated into software systems and AI services, making efficient LLM serving a concern for software engineering. Serving LLMs is challenging because inference requires computation, memory, GPU resources, and execution while maintaining latency and throughput. Although prior research has proposed LLM inference, optimization, and serving techniques and frameworks, little is known about how they are adopted in practice. In this study, we investigate the use of LLM serving frameworks and serving methods in open-source software systems. We identify and analyze five LLM-specific frameworks: vLLM, SGLang, TensorRT-LLM, LMDeploy, and FlashInfer. We examine how these frameworks and techniques are adopted individually and in combination, how adoption varies across categories of LLMs, and how repositories differ in intent, focus, use case, and architectural design. Our results show that vLLM is the most visible framework in popularity and adoption, while parallel computation, memory management, and network pruning are the most frequently used serving-method categories. Multi-framework usage is limited, suggesting that developers rely on a single serving framework; however, combined frameworks connect complementary capabilities across the serving stack. Framework adoption varies across model families, modalities, model sizes, domain specializations, and deployment settings. Repository-level analysis shows that LLM serving frameworks support applications and architectures, including Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based reasoning, multimodal generation and understanding, microservices, and cloud infrastructure. Overall, this study provides a large-scale empirical characterization of LLM serving framework adoption in practice and offers insights for researchers, framework maintainers, and practitioners working on LLM systems.
MaverIQ is an intent-based LLM inference serving system that automatically maps user intents to deployment configurations while minimizing operational cost for the provider and reduces profiling overheads by 7-15× compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
Dimitrios Liakopoulos, Prasoon Sinha, Tianrui Hu et al.· ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems...· 0 citations
This study discloses the model efficiency for different tasks, causes of failed fs tasks, and techniques for mitigating LLM failures, and will open source \phi-Bench to facilitate public research on using LLMs for fs development.
This work evaluates 70+ SLMs from 2023–2025 on five task-specific benchmarks and compares them with two popular LLMs, revealing key trade-offs between energy, performance, and model selection and highlighting the need for informed, task-aware model selection rather than size-driven choices.
Fabian Reichwald, Lukas Schiesser, Christiane Plociennik et al.· 0 citations
Lightweight large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being deployed locally on personal computers and are expected to play a growing role in resource-constrained edge and mobile environments. In such settings, energy consumption, execution time, and memory usage directly affect practical usability, yet existing evaluations of LLM efficiency largely rely on proxy descriptors such as parameter count or FLOPs, often decoupled from task precision. This paper introduces a PTME-based experimental framework for the precision-aware profiling of lightweight LLM inference, jointly measuring Precision, execution Time, peak Memory usage, and Energy consumption through direct hardware-level measurements. The methodology is applied to a representative set of lightweight LLMs executed locally under edge-class resource envelopes on a controlled desktop platform, using benchmarks spanning code generation, mathematical reasoning, and multi-task understanding. We find that static proxy descriptors approximate inference cost well but fail to predict precision. Tightening the resource envelope increases cost without affecting precision, amplifying execution time more strongly than energy and penalizing larger models the most. Moreover, no single model dominates across all PTME dimensions, and a Pareto analysis reveals non-dominated configurations that would be hidden by accuracy-only or efficiency-only assessments, providing practical guidance for selecting models under different resource envelopes. These results show that selecting lightweight LLMs by size, FLOPs, latency, or accuracy alone can select the wrong deployment candidate; PTME profiling exposes configurations that preserve useful accuracy at lower physical cost.
Tomohiro Harada, Enrique Alba, Gabriel Luque· arXiv.org· 0 citations
LLM4LLM is introduced, a deployment-aware closed-loop optimization framework that starts from a target inference script, extracts phase-aware optimization tasks, searches with an experience-guided episodic agent, and accepts patches through in-model validation.
Hui Zeng, Pengfei Yang, Yanxin Chen et al.· 0 citations
The design of transformer-based Large Language Models (LLMs) is being radically changed through new architectures that are able to overcome scalability limitations of previous designs, including Mixture-of-Experts (MoE), Multi-Head Latent Attention (MLA), and Multi-Token Prediction (MTP). As an open-weighted model released at the end of 2024, which has both state of the art architectural transparency and production scale efficiency, DeepSeeek-V3 represents the ultimate testing ground for investigating these modern technologies. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the architectural structure of DeepSeek-V3 based upon information from the DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, industry benchmarking data and independent latency testing, to demonstrate how various techniques can be used to optimize training while still providing competitive performance in code generation and mathematical reasoning. In addition, latency testing conducted on a Distilled version of DeepSeek-V3, with approximately 14 billion parameters, running on a T4 GPU, reveals that although significant improvements have been made in optimizing latency there remains substantial barriers to deploying these models. Through this context, this research will serve as a reference document for practitioners and researchers who wish to understand current trends and challenges in increasing accessibility to high performance AI models.
Yassine Zouhdi, B. Hdioud· EPJ Web of Conferences· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
