Factorized {AdaBoost.MH} achieves the same boosting-type convergence rate as {AdaBoost.MH} up to a universal constant factor, removing the previously suggested additional dependence on $n$ or $K$ in the number of boosting rounds.
Abstract
{AdaBoost.MH} reduces multi-class classification to a collection of binary subproblems and enjoys the classical boosting-type convergence guarantee under a weak learning condition. A more structured variant, Factorized {AdaBoost.MH}, uses base classifiers of the form $\mathbf{h}(x)=\alpha \mathbf{v} \bm{\varphi}(x)$, where a single binary classifier $\bm{\varphi}$ is shared across all classes and the label dependence is carried by a vote vector $\mathbf{v} \in\{\pm1\}^K$. This factorization is algorithmically attractive and achieves better performance in practice, but its convergence depends on whether one can always choose a vote vector with sufficiently large induced binary weight mass. Previous work resolved this question with a lower bound $\max\{1/n,1/\sqrt{2K}\}$, which still leaves a dimension-dependent slowdown relative to the original {AdaBoost.MH} analysis. In this paper, we sharpen this combinatorial step. For the minimax quantity $\mathfrak{W}_{n,K}$ governing the factorized edge, we prove $\mathfrak{W}_{n,K} = C_{\min\{n+1,K\}}$, where $C_q=1$ for $q=1$, $C_q=q/(3q-4)$ for even $q\ge2$, and $C_q=(q+1)/(3q-1)$ for odd $q\ge2$. Since $C_q\downarrow 1/3$, our bounds show that $\mathfrak{W}_{n,K}=\Theta(1)$ uniformly over $n$ and $K$. Consequently, Factorized {AdaBoost.MH} achieves the same boosting-type convergence rate as {AdaBoost.MH} up to a universal constant factor, removing the previously suggested additional dependence on $n$ or $K$ in the number of boosting rounds.
The upper bound proof follows by combining the known fact that AdaBoost outputs a voting classifier whose voting function has zero empirical $\gamma/2$-margin loss with what is, to the best of the authors' knowledge, a new margin-based generalization bound for voting classifiers.
Worst-case multiclass bounds do not become smaller when the best classifier is already nearly correct: what is missing is an optimistic rate, a guarantee whose fluctuation scales with the oracle risk itself. For a class of Natarajan dimension $d_N$ and Daniely-Shalev-Shwartz dimension $d_{DS}$, the optimal excess risk is known at the two endpoints ($d_{DS}/n$ realizable, $\sqrt{d_N/n}+d_{DS}/n$ agnostic [HMZ24, CEH+26, Pab26]) and open in between. We close the gap: at every fixed oracle risk $L^\star$, the optimal excess risk is $\widetilde{\Theta}(\sqrt{L^\star d_N/n}+d_{DS}/n)$, uniformly in the alphabet size, attained by a learner that knows neither $L^\star$ nor the confidence level. The upper bound composes the cover-menu-compression architecture of [CEH+26], at the realizable rate of [Pab26], with a new comparator-facing relative compression theorem: a size-$k$ compression rule that empirically dominates a comparator $h$ has population risk at most $L(h)+O(\sqrt{L(h)\Gamma}+\Gamma)$ with $\Gamma=(k\log n+\log(1/\delta))/n$, without stability; this transfers the comparison principle of the sharp binary theory [MQZ26] while discarding its Boolean-cube geometry, which does not lift to multiclass labels. The lower bound forces both terms using one class and one distribution at every fixed $L^\star$, by a pair-Assouad scheme calibrated to $L^\star$ and a fiber argument on the pseudo-cubes underlying the Natarajan-versus-DS separation of [BCD+22]. Both theorems extend to list learning: against the best $r$-tuple of hypotheses, the same architecture and the same two engines yield an optimistic rate and a lower bound of the same shape, forcing the fluctuation term that [Pab26] expected to be necessary against list comparators, and removing the factor $r$ from the known realizable list lower bound.
Xiaoyu Li, Andi Han, Jiaojiao Jiang et al.· 1 citation
We study when and how momentum improves large-batch training in the one-pass regime, using power-law kernel regression as a tractable setting. We first characterize risk stability through the critical learning rate, defined as the largest learning rate for stable training, and obtain $\eta_{\mathrm{SGD}}^{\mathrm{crit}}\eqsim 1$, $\eta_{\mathrm{Polyak}}^{\mathrm{crit}}\eqsim \min\{1,B(1-\rho)\}$, and $\eta_{\mathrm{Nesterov}}^{\mathrm{crit}}\eqsim \min\{1,B^\beta(1-\rho)\}$, where $B$ is the batch size, $\rho$ is the momentum factor, and $\beta>1$ is the capacity exponent. Within this admissible region, we derive scaling laws for the full risk dynamics, capturing the progression from an early transient, through power-law decay, to a noise floor. We then minimize the final-step risk over the admissible learning rates and momentum factors under a fixed data budget, yielding a three-regime batch-size phase diagram that reveals how the role of momentum changes with batch size. Notably, Polyak enlarges the critical batch size, the largest batch size preserving the best small-batch data-scaling exponent, thereby enabling greater parallelism without sacrificing data efficiency. In contrast, Nesterov achieves better data efficiency in the large-batch regime because its look-ahead mechanism suppresses noise accumulation. Numerical experiments validate the predicted stability boundaries, risk dynamics, and batch-size phase diagram.
Jia-Nan Wang, Zi-Xun Huang, Kai-Rui Li et al.· 0 citations
In transductive classification, an adversary fixes a labeled population, one label is hidden uniformly, and the learner sees all remaining labels. For binary classes, agnostic transductive and PAC learning have the same minimax rate. Whether this extends to multiclass learning was open, especially for unbounded label spaces where uniform convergence can fail. We resolve the question up to logarithmic factors. For every multiclass class $\mathcal H$ with DS dimension $d_{DS}$ and Natarajan dimension $d_{\mathrm N}$, the optimal agnostic transductive excess error satisfies $\widetilde\Theta\left(\frac{d_{DS}}{n}+\sqrt{\frac{d_{\mathrm N}}{n}}\right).$ The result holds for arbitrary label spaces. The two terms are both necessary. A DS pseudo-cube gives the realizable $d_{DS}/n$ obstruction, while a Natarajan cube with repeated points and fair labels gives the agnostic $\sqrt{d_{\mathrm N}/n}$ obstruction. The upper bound uses a random-reservation principle. The learner deliberately ignores a constant fraction of the visible labels, which makes the true test point uniform in a large unseen block. We combine realizable compression, a label-space reduction, and inside-menu agnostic compression across this finite-population split. A new without-replacement multiplicative-weights lemma preserves the fast $d_{DS}/n$ term. Consequently, agnostic multiclass PAC and transductive learning obey the same two-dimension law up to logarithmic factors.
This work improves the upper bound to match the best known lower bound, thus establishing the optimal error guarantee for learning under Tsybakov noise.
Steve Hanneke, Hongao Wang, Mingyue Xu· 0 citations
For finite-horizon tabular CVaR reinforcement learning, prior work proves a $\widetilde{O}(\tau^{-1}\sqrt{SAK})$ leading regret bound for arbitrary normalized return laws and the sharper $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{SAK/\tau})$ rate under a density lower bound. We show that the same Bernstein CVaR-UCBVI algorithm attains the sharper rate without continuity assumptions. The key is a selected-budget self-bound: the conditional variance of the episode shortfall is at most $\tau$ plus the value-estimation width. Substitution into the original Bernstein decomposition yields, with high probability, $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{SAK/\tau}+(SAHK^{1/4}+S^2AH)/\tau)$ regret for arbitrary normalized return laws, including atomic, mixed, and continuous laws. The $\tau^{-1/2}$ leading term matches the expected-regret minimax lower bound up to logarithmic factors. Thus Bernstein CVaR-UCBVI is minimax-optimal over the full return-law class in the leading-order regime; the lower-order terms retain their $\tau^{-1}$ dependence.
Yuan-Long Chen· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
