This work proposes an objective deep-learning approach classifying ADHD via task-evoked pupil diameter and binocular eye-movement synchrony during a visual cueing task in 439 participants across 14 clinical centers, offering a robust tool to reduce subjective clinical bias.
Abstract
Current ADHD diagnostic practices rely on subjective rating scales and continuous performance tests with limited specificity. We propose an objective deep-learning approach classifying ADHD via task-evoked pupil diameter and binocular eye-movement synchrony during a visual cueing task in 439 participants across 14 clinical centers. We implemented two independent models: a multiple instance learning (MIL) framework for pupil dynamics and conventional classifiers for eye-movement synchrony. The outputs of these models were fused to derive two novel indices, a diagnostic score and an impulsivity score. Using a three-zone policy (healthy, ADHD, uncertain) to manage diagnostic uncertainty, pediatric cross-validation (N=324) yielded diagnostic and impulsivity sensitivities of 0.79 and 0.74, and specificities of 0.82 and 0.70. Adult external testing (N=115) achieved specificities of 0.86 and 0.92, with sensitivities of 0.66 and 0.68. Explainable AI confirmed predictions are driven by increasing pupil responses immediately following cue and stimulus onsets. Statistical projections estimate that integrating this tool with standard rating scales can optimize diagnostic pathways, yielding 95% sensitivity in a screening mode or 96% specificity in a confirmation mode. These physiologically grounded biomarkers reliably quantify cognitive impairments, offering a robust tool to reduce subjective clinical bias.
Using a portable EEG device with a low participant burden and a deep learning model to distinguish between the typical development group (TD) and the NDD group, comprising children with ASD, ADHD, and ASD + ADHD is used.
Headache is the most common neurological disorder in children and substantially affects quality of life. We investigated whether resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) can support pediatric headache classification using machine learning. We encoded rs-fMRI data using NeuroSTORM, a recent foundation model, and fine-tuned it to distinguish healthy controls from children with headache and subsequently classify headache subtypes. We compared NeuroSTORM with a standard neuroscience approach using functional-connectivity (FC) matrices derived from brain activity as predictors. Using 189 rs-fMRI scans from 110 individuals collected across two visits (prevalence of any headache: 74%), NeuroSTORM achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.82-0.82) and an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.93-0.94) for discriminating headache from non-headache. In contrast, models trained on FC matrices showed lower performance (AUROC, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.67-0.67]; AUPRC, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.85-0.85]). In multiclass classification of healthy controls, chronic migraine, and non-chronic headaches (e.g., post-viral headache, new daily persistent headache, post-traumatic headache), NeuroSTORM achieved a macro-AUROC of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.68-0.69). Results suggest that the approach can distinguish chronic migraine but has difficulty differentiating other headache subtypes from chronic migraine. Overall, under limited-data conditions, NeuroSTORM appears to capture latent rs-fMRI representations that transfer to headache-related tasks without relying on FC features. These findings provide proof of concept for fMRI-based prediction of pediatric headache and highlight potential future utility for subtype identification and individualized treatment strategies.
G. S. I. Aldeia, Clara Moon, J. Shulman et al.· 0 citations
Background/Objectives: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are frequently co-occurring neurodevelopmental conditions with partially overlapping neurophysiological profiles. Electroencephalography (EEG) provides non-invasive access to candidate biomarkers, yet the literature remains largely organized around single-diagnosis frameworks, limiting comparison across conditions and constraining translation into intervention selection. This review compares EEG signatures across ASD and ADHD from a transdiagnostic perspective and examines how such signatures might inform the selection of non-pharmacological interventions. Methods: A structured search of PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore and Web of Science identified peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2026 reporting EEG findings in ASD and/or ADHD, spanning resting-state, task-based, connectivity, event-related potential, machine learning and intervention studies. Sixty-eight sources were synthesized thematically. Given substantial heterogeneity in acquisition parameters and analytic pipelines, evidence was integrated interpretively rather than pooled quantitatively, and no formal risk-of-bias assessment was undertaken. Results: Shared features across both conditions frequently included low-frequency theta excess, reduced alpha modulation under cognitive load, and flattened aperiodic (1/f) slopes—a pattern compatible with, though not a direct measurement of, altered excitation/inhibition balance. While substantial heterogeneity exists, disorder-specific signatures often comprised the ASD “U-shaped” spectral profile alongside elevated epileptiform activity, and frontally pronounced theta/beta ratio elevation in subsets of individuals with ADHD. Machine-learning studies increasingly emphasize interpretable, multidomain feature sets over binary classification. Mindfulness-based and neurofeedback interventions converge on theta reduction and alpha enhancement, although reported effects are frequently conditional on responder status, task context, or outcome-rater blinding. Conclusions: Convergent EEG features support a transdiagnostic account of neurodevelopmental dysregulation. A biomarker-informed framework for intervention selection is proposed, which requires prospective validation before clinical application.
Akshay Bhuvaneswari Ramakrishnan, N. NavaneethaKrishnan, William Mahler et al.· Brain Science· 0 citations
Frequency-specific resting-state features, particularly local synchronization in the slow-4 band, capture developmental-stage-related variation within ASD, highlighting the potential of frequency-specific rs-fMRI metrics as candidate markers for characterizing neurodevelopmental stages in ASD.
Qi Huang, Sisi Jiang, Cheng Luo et al.· Frontiers in Neuroscience· 0 citations
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects millions globally, yet current diagnostic approaches rely on subjective behavioral assessments without objective neurophysiological markers. While machine learning on electroencephalogram (EEG) data shows promise for automated ADHD risk screening, current methods focus only on brain signals and ignore socioeconomic factors that strongly affect neurodevelopment and ADHD risk. We introduce a novel multimodal deep learning architecture integrating three complementary streams: temporal EEG dynamics via one-dimensional convolutional-recurrent networks, spectro-temporal patterns via two-dimensional convolutional networks with spatial and channel attention, and socioeconomic context via feedforward processing, combined through an attention-based fusion mechanism. Using the Cognitive Electrophysiology in Socioeconomic Context dataset, we evaluate performance across four cognitive tasks with 5-fold stratified cross-validation, ablation studies and benchmarking against a state-of-the-art EEG classification model. Under epoch-level cross-validation, the multimodal approach outperforms EEG-only baselines across all four tasks, achieving accuracy improvements of 2.1–5.9% and sensitivity gains up to 12.2%, with strong positive-class F1-scores (96.4–99.8%). Results showed higher epoch-level performance when socioeconomic context was incorporated alongside neurophysiological signals, a pattern that held across diverse cognitive paradigms. Leave-One-Subject-Out Cross-Validation across all four tasks yielded accuracy of 0.86–0.91 for the EEG-only model and 0.92–0.96 for the multimodal model, with sensitivity of 0.71–0.96 and specificity of 0.95–1.00 for the multimodal model. These subject-independent estimates are more modest than the epoch-level figures and McNemar’s test on paired predictions did not reach significance on any task. The EEG backbone, evaluated without modification on an independent paediatric dataset, also achieved 80.4% subject-independent accuracy, outperforming the prior benchmark. Labels derive from a validated self-report screening instrument rather than clinical diagnosis; this model should be understood as a proof-of-concept for ADHD risk screening, not a diagnostic tool. This work suggests the feasibility of context-aware ADHD risk screening that accounts for environmental influences on neurodevelopment alongside neurophysiological signals.