Skip to content

Don't Trust the AI Ecosystem: Analyzing Privacy Leakage in Compromised Open-Source Components

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.27886 · 0 citations · 32 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

GradLock is introduced, a novel training-time injection attack that stealthily injects sensitive training data directly into the model parameters and employs dynamic gradient locking to prevent payload degradation during the optimization process.

Abstract

Existing model inversion (MI) attacks predominantly rely on post-training optimization to recover private data from model outputs. However, these methods are fundamentally constrained by the target model's generalization bottleneck, often yielding generic features rather than specific identities, particularly on high-dimensional datasets. In this paper, we introduce GradLock, a novel training-time injection attack that stealthily injects sensitive training data directly into the model parameters. Operating within a compromised supply chain context, GradLock leverages stateless deterministic indexing to establish isolated data vaults and employs dynamic gradient locking to prevent payload degradation during the optimization process. This mechanism allows the adversary to extract pixel-perfect data from the final model without retaining access to the training environment. Extensive experiments on MNIST, Imagenette, and CelebA demonstrate that GradLock achieves near-lossless reconstruction (SSIM ~ 1.0) and instant extraction (<1.0s). Compared to existing training-time injection methods, our approach exhibits superior robustness against standard deployment optimizations, including quantization, pruning, and fine-tuning. Furthermore, a user deployment study reveals that 93.3% of participants failed to detect the malicious logic, highlighting a severe blind spot in the security of modern AI supply chains.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Gecko: Fast Private Inference via Secure Public Encoder Offloading

Gecko is presented, designed to limit this additional risk while retaining a compact encrypted predictor, and formalizes ideal independence and information-preservation conditions as design guidance, then separately evaluate component-reuse extraction attacks.

Cheng'an Wei, Kai Chen, Yue Zhao et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Not to Break, but to Attest: Adversarial Probes for Privacy-Preserving LLM Verification

A privacy-preserving zk-SNARK-based audit framework that searches for probes designed in the spirit of adversarial examples to amplify logit drift between an approved model and a modified deployment and demonstrates that token-based probes consistently deliver the strongest mean sensitivity across models and GPU platforms, although operating in a black-box setting.

Cameron Wilding, Mina Shaker, Fatemeh Ganji · 0 citations
Jul 2026

TriShield: Zero-Utility-Loss Defense Against Privacy Backdoors in Federated Language Model Fine-Tuning via Orthogonal Gradient Projection and Optimizer State Entanglement

TriShield is presented, a three-layer deterministic defense that completely prevents NeuroImprint-style reconstruction with zero model utility loss and no additional communication rounds, and it is proved theoretically that after Layers 2 and 3, the mutual information between the uploaded gradient and any individual training sample is zero.

Chenghui Wei · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Adversarial Training and Differential Privacy-Style Noise Injection for Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Learning

An improved defense mechanism that combines adversarial training and differential-privacy-style noise injection to collectively enhance the robustness of the existing KDk defense mechanism with marginal model utility trade-off is introduced.

N. Azeez, Oluwatobi Sunday Malomo, Omotolani Mary Okerinde et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.