Skip to content

Vulnerability-aware reinforcement learning scheduling of AI data centers under typhoon-induced thermal coupling

Oct 2026 · Electric Power Systems Research · 28 references
Electric Power System Optimization Power System Optimization and Stability

Abstract

The rapid growth of AI data-center loads, amplified by typhoon-induced thermal coupling between workloads and cooling systems, poses new challenges to transmission grid vulnerability assessment and scheduling. This paper develops a vulnerability-aware reinforcement-learning (RL) scheduling framework that integrates a measured-data-driven AI load model, a typhoon-day temperature–PUE–cooling model, a seven-indicator vulnerability assessment covering physical, structural, and AI-specific dimensions, and RL scheduling via PPO, SAC, and TD3 with a PTDF-based top- K branch-selection mechanism that confines control to AI-responsive branches. Validation on the IEEE 39-bus and 118-bus systems shows that all three RL algorithms achieve statistically significant V DC reductions of 6.9–9.3% ( p < .001), with PPO outperforming an LP comparator by 3.4–8.4% on the 118- and 1354-bus systems. The reduction magnitude correlates with the vulnerability-gradient signal—the product of mean PTDF sensitivity and baseline vulnerability—rather than with system size per se: on the PEGASE 1354-bus system, where the AI load represents only 0.016% of total system demand and the transmission network is highly robust, no scheduling strategy produces a meaningful V DC response, confirming a physical optimization ceiling governed by AI load penetration rather than network size. Under extreme stress at 3.0 × AI load, TD3 reduces EENS by 44%, confirming V DC as a proactive leading indicator of curtailment risk. An ablation study identifies topological sensitivity as the most influential indicator. The proposed framework provides grid operators with ex-ante guidance on when vulnerability-aware scheduling becomes effective, based on the relationship between AI load penetration, vulnerability gradients, and system controllability.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.