Skip to content
Preprint

Anti-Shortcut Distillation via Temporal Negative Knowledge Transfer

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 38 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A push--pull KD framework that treats the converged teacher $\Tfinal$ as a positive semantic anchor and an early-checkpoint teacher $\Tearly$ as a temporal negative reference, ASD attains the highest clean top-1 accuracy on more than 10 pairs and outperforms standard KD on 12.

Abstract

Knowledge distillation (KD) trains a compact student by attracting it towards a converged teacher. It is silent about which directions the teacher itself learned to suppress: repulsive and bias-aware objectives exist, but none exploits the teacher's own trajectory to identify what the student should avoid. We observe that the missing signal is already encoded in the teacher's optimization trajectory: features that an early-stage teacher emphasizes but that a converged teacher attenuates are precisely the shortcut directions worth pushing the student away from. We instantiate this observation as \textbf{A}nti-\textbf{S}hortcut \textbf{D}istillation (ASD), a push--pull KD framework that treats the converged teacher $\Tfinal$ as a positive semantic anchor and an early-checkpoint teacher $\Tearly$ as a temporal negative reference. ASD couples two losses: a temporal contrastive loss ($\Ltc$) that places the early-teacher feature as a same-sample negative against in-batch and memory-bank final-teacher features in an InfoNCE objective; and a shortcut suppression loss ($\Lss$) that penalizes student projection onto the top eigenvectors of $\E[\Dh\Dh^{\top}]$, the uncentered second-moment matrix of early-to-final feature displacements. Across 13 teacher--student pairs on CIFAR-100, ImageNet-100, and TinyImageNet, ASD attains the highest clean top-1 accuracy on more than 10 pairs and outperforms standard KD on 12. On CIFAR-100-C corruption robustness, ASD obtains the lowest mean Corruption Error ($86.1$\,mCE) on the most challenging cross-architecture pair (WRN-40-2$\to$ShuffleNet-V2). Mechanistic diagnostics confirm the intended geometry: the ASD student is systematically anti-aligned with the shortcut direction, while its projection onto the robust subspace is substantially larger ($0.45$ vs.\ $0.12$).

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Knowledge Distillation under Teacher Misspecification: An Order-Parameter Analysis of the Gap between Teacher Mimicry and Task Performance

It is proved that the learning dynamics and the distillation error $\Ets$ are exactly invariant to $\dmiss$, whereas the true error $\Etzs$ and the gap $\Delta=\Etzs-\Ets$ are strictly increasing in $\dmiss$, with a rate that is amplified linearly by the complexity $M_0$ of the true teacher.

K. Hara, H. Hino · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Self-Supervised Visual On-Policy Distillation

Self-Supervised Visual On-Policy Distillation (S$^2$VOPD), a simple yet effective method that constructs on-policy learning signals from asymmetric augmented views, systematically explores a broad design space of visual augmentations and uncover that asymmetry matters.

Yijiang Li, Yijun Liang, Yunjie Tian et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Beyond the Best Teacher: Expanding and Compressing the Reasoning Solution Manifold

Strong students can be obtained not by selecting a single better teacher, but by deliberately constructing and compressing a complementary teacher union, in an expand-then-compress framework that couples teacher construction with multi-teacher policy distillation.

Songshuo Lu, Zhi Chen, Yao-Hua Tang · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Rethinking Reverse KL as Adaptive Entropy Distillation

This work revisits on-policy Reverse Kullback-Leibler distillation and decomposes its objective into a teacher-fitting term and a student-entropy term, without introducing an explicit FKL branch, and proposes Adaptive Entropy Distillation (AED), which uses the teacher's entropy to dynamically calibrate token-level imitation strength.

Shizheng Li, Zhiyu Shen, Yuyin Lu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Learning What to Remember: Test-Time Training via Context Distillation

This work proposes TTCD, a TTT framework that introduces a self-supervised objective for allocating limited memory capacity for future use, and focuses on an in-place variant: In-Place TTCD, which uses the existing MLP parameters as the fast weights.

Zixuan Wang, Xingyu Dang, Ruiming Zhu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Tail-Aware Top-$k$ On-Policy Distillation

On-policy distillation (OPD) has emerged as an effective paradigm for transferring knowledge between language models, where a student is trained to align its next-token distribution with the teacher's along its own trajectories. To provide dense supervision at tractable cost, many works minimize the reverse Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the student and teacher's normalized distributions over the teacher's top-$k$ tokens. However, this normalized objective discards the information about tail probability: the total probability outside the teacher's top-$k$ tokens. As a result, the optimization can steadily increase the student's tail probability and entropy, empirically degrading downstream accuracy. To address this issue, we propose Tail-Aware Top-$k$ OPD (\textbf{TA-OPD}), a novel distillation method that restores the missing tail probability signal. In particular, TA-OPD minimizes the reverse KL divergence over the top-$k$ tokens plus a tail token that carries the tail probability. In effect, TA-OPD better aligns the student's next-token distribution with the teacher's, preventing the increase in tail probability and entropy caused by top-$k$ normalization. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of TA-OPD, improving Avg@8 by up to 8.05 points on common benchmarks. Our code is available at https://github.com/HuipengHuang/TA-OPD.

Huipeng Huang, Hongxin Wei · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.