Skip to content

On architectural choices for interpretability and thermodynamic consistency in Physically Recurrent Neural Networks in the low-data regime

Oct 2026 · 1 citation · 24 references
Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

An adjoint encoder-decoder structure with positive scalar contributions ensures energy consistency across scales and non-negative dissipation, leading to even lower training requirements, and demonstrates that data efficiency can be improved with careful architectural choices rooted in the underlying physics.

Abstract

In this paper, we unravel the effect of different decoder architectures on the interpretability of the latent space of the Physically Recurrent Neural Network. Particular emphasis is given to a new weight normalization constraint, which acts as a regularization technique and enables robust training in the low-data regime. A brief visual exploration illustrates how these changes impact the latent space and how the fictitious stress can align with the true state of the RVE without explicit training. Reaping the benefits of a meaningful latent space, a case study illustrates how information from the microscopic level can be retrieved and incorporated into a multi-task approach that does not require extra parameters or larger training sets. Another key contribution shows that a specific architectural choice can naturally lead to a thermodynamically consistent formulation. By enforcing an adjoint encoder-decoder structure with positive scalar contributions, this modification ensures energy consistency across scales and non-negative dissipation, leading to even lower training requirements. This alternative completes the study on interpretability, inductive bias, and thermodynamic consistency, and demonstrates that data efficiency can be improved with careful architectural choices rooted in the underlying physics.

View source

Similar papers

Sep 2026

PINNA: Physics‐Informed Neural Networks Architecture for Implicit Governing Physics With Interpretability

PINNA is validated across three fundamentally different benchmarks: two composite‐material problems involving nonlinear stress‐strain behavior and multistage failure, and a large‐scale 1‐D laminar combustion problem governed by stiff chemical kinetics, thermal transport, and reduced fluid mechanics.

Zheng-Tao Yao, Philippe Hawi, V. Aitharaju et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Describing materials via interpretable machine learning: the example of superconductivity.

This work employs the sure-independence screening and sparsifying operator (SISSO) symbolic-regression method to identify an interpretable analytical equation for the superconducting critical temperature (Tc) as an example of a materials property.

Herzain I. Rivera-Arrieta, L. Foppa · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

The importance of tensor handling and implementation of physics-informed DeepONets

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) reduce or eliminate the need for large labelled datasets by enforcing governing equations during training. Physics-informed Deep Operator Networks (PI-DeepONets) extend this approach to learning solution operators, enabling rapid prediction across families of problems. Despite t...

Nahum Banks, G. D. de Almeida, Sergio Maldonado · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Beyond Quadratic Loss: The Stability Phase Diagram of Adam

This work connects Adam loss spikes to both the mismatch between momentum timescales and finite-scale superquadratic loss geometry beyond the Hessian, and shows that confident cross-entropy losses develop a core--wall landscape comprising a narrow quadratic core followed by a steep wall, which produces effective superq...

Gao-Xiang Tang, Huan-Ran Chen, Zi-Ming Liu · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Green-Routed Neural Operators: Physics Determines Where the Network Reads

We identify a mismatch between the physical role of transport fields in many PDEs and their usual role in neural operators: PDEs use them to select read coordinates, whereas neural operators typically treat them only as input values. We address this mismatch with the Green-Routed Neural Operator (GRNO), which uses the...

Chen-Hao Si, Ming Yan · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.