Skip to content
#data science Open access

A cross-sectional study of hepatitis B vaccination coverage and occupational risk exposure among health science students in a Nigerian University

Oct 2026 · Discover Public Health · 24 references

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Despite the presence of a safe and effective vaccine for hepatitis B virus (HBV), health science students remain at significant risk for infection. This study assessed HBV vaccination coverage, awareness, and associated factors among health science students at Usmanu Danfodiyo University in Sokoto, Nigeria. Methodology A cross-sectional study targeting 427 health science students was conducted at Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto between July 19 and September 10, 2025. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing hepatitis B awareness, vaccination status, barriers, motivators, and occupational risks. Analysis used IBM SPSS version 25, with descriptive statistics, chi-square tests ( p < 0.05), and binary logistic regression, while the Hosmer–Lemeshow test and Nagelkerke R² assessed model fit and explained variance. Results A total of 410 students participated (mean age 22.36 ± 2.94 years). Awareness of the hepatitis B vaccine was high (87.8%), but uptake was low (26.8%), only 12.2% were fully vaccinated, and 50.7% of unvaccinated students were willing to vaccinate. Key barriers included vaccine inaccessibility, cost, and limited information, while major motivators were prior exposure to infection (57.3%), institutional requirements (47.6%), and trust in public health institutions (43.9%). Occupational exposures were common, with poor post-exposure practices. Uptake was significantly associated with department and level of study. Logistic regression identified female gender (AOR = 2.15, p = 0.007), department, and higher level of study (AOR = 1.006, p = 0.001) as independent predictors. Conclusion Low hepatitis B vaccine uptake persists despite awareness; improving access, education, and mandatory policies is essential for high-risk health science students.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.