Extensions of Factor, Signal-Flow, Control-Flow, Dataflow, and PERT/CPM Graphs to Hypergraphs and Superhypergraphs with Illustrative Applications in Engineering and Intelligent Computing
Oct 2026· International Scientific Spectrum· 0 citations· 36 references
Abstract
Graphs represent pairwise relations through vertices and edges, whereas hypergraphs capture multi-way interactions by allowing each hyperedge to connect an arbitrary number of vertices. Superhypergraphs extend this representation through an iterated powerset construction, enabling nested, multi-level relations in which set-valued objects serve as higher-order entities. This paper develops a unified framework for extending five widely used graph models—factor graphs, signal flow graphs, control flow graphs, dataflow graphs, and PERT/CPM networks—to hypergraphs and superhypergraphs. For each model, we present a uniform lifting principle, formal definitions of the corresponding hypergraph and n-superhypergraph structures, and illustrative examples showing how multi-way interactions and hierarchical dependencies can be represented. We also establish that the classical graph models are embedded as special cases of the proposed frameworks. These constructions provide a theoretical foundation for multi-level dependency modeling across inference, dynamical systems, program analysis, streaming computation, and project scheduling, with computational implementation and empirical validation remaining directions for future research.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.