Skip to content
#explainable ai Dataset Open access

Приложение B. Половые различия в отношении к искусственному интеллекту / Appendix B. Gender Differences in Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Приложение В содержит результаты проверки гипотезы 2 о наличии половых различий в отношении к искусственному интеллекту с учётом контроля профиля обучения. В таблице В1 представлены результаты двухфакторного дисперсионного анализа (ANOVA, тип III) для пяти шкал отношения к ИИ: AIAS-4 (общее отношение), доверие к ИИ, готовность использовать ИИ, безопасность ИИ и комфорт при взаимодействии с ИИ. Показано, что после контроля профиля обучения половые различия оказались незначимыми для большинства шкал (AIAS-4: p = 0,149; доверие: p = 0,102; готовность: p = 0,102; безопасность: p = 0,781). Единственное сохранившееся значимое различие — комфорт при взаимодействии с ИИ (F(1,149) = 5,59, p = 0,019, η²p = 0,036): мужчины чувствуют себя комфортнее, чем женщины. В таблице В2 приведены описательные статистики (средние и стандартные отклонения) по каждой шкале для мужчин и женщин. Полученные результаты свидетельствуют о том, что первоначально обнаруженные половые различия в отношении к ИИ объясняются смешением с профилем обучения: в IT-профиле преобладают юноши, которые более позитивно относятся к ИИ. Appendix B presents the results of testing Hypothesis 2 regarding gender differences in attitudes toward artificial intelligence while controlling for academic profile. Table B1 shows the results of two-way ANOVA (Type III) for five AI attitude scales: AIAS-4 (general attitude), trust in AI, willingness to use AI, AI safety, and AI comfort. After controlling for academic profile, gender differences were non-significant for most scales (AIAS-4: p = 0.149; trust: p = 0.102; willingness: p = 0.102; safety: p = 0.781). The only remaining significant difference was AI comfort (F(1,149) = 5.59, p = 0.019, η²p = 0.036): males reported greater comfort than females. Table B2 provides descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations) for each scale by gender. The results indicate that initially detected gender differences in AI attitudes are explained by confounding with academic profile: the IT profile is dominated by males, who hold more positive attitudes toward AI.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Apr 2020

ECCOLA - a Method for Implementing Ethically Aligned AI Systems

The method, ECCOLA, is presented, which aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.

Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson · 64 citations · ⚡6
#computer vision Review Apr 2024

AI-powered Code Review with LLMs: Early Results

The goal is to not only refine the accuracy of the LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.

Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem et al. · 62 citations · ⚡3
#computer vision Open access Mar 2024

LLM-based agents for automating the enhancement of user story quality: An early report

The use of large language models to automatically improve the user story quality in Austrian Post Group IT agile teams is explored, with a reference model for an Autonomous LLM-based Agent System developed and implemented at the company.

Zheying Zhang, M. Rayhan, Tomas Herda et al. · 48 citations · ⚡4
#computer vision Review Mar 2024

System for systematic literature review using multiple AI agents: Concept and an empirical evaluation

This paper introduces a novel multi-AI-agent system designed to fully automate SLRs, and demonstrates how it substantially reduces the time and effort traditionally required for SLRs while maintaining comprehensiveness and precision.

Abdul Malik Sami, Z. Rasheed, Kai-Kristian Kemell et al. · 44 citations · ⚡2
#computer vision Feb 2024

Can Large Language Models Serve as Data Analysts? A Multi-Agent Assisted Approach for Qualitative Data Analysis

The proposed LLM-based multi-agent system automates qualitative data analysis process, creating opportunities for researchers and practitioners, and future improvements focus on enhancing multilingual performance and integrating continuous expert feedback.

Z. Rasheed, Muhammad Waseem, Aakash Ahmad et al. · 41 citations
#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

The Key Concepts of Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

It is suggested that the focus on finding keywords is the first step in guiding and providing direction for future research in the AI ethics field.

Ville Vakkuri, P. Abrahamsson · 39 citations · ⚡2

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.