Skip to content
#reinforcement learning Review Open access

Technology scanning: a systematic mapping review using text analytics

Oct 2026 · Scientometrics · 0 citations · 107 references

Abstract

In rapidly changing technological environments, companies must effectively identify and evaluate technological changes to sustain their dynamic capabilities. The growing body of research on technology scanning and innovation trajectories makes it difficult to perform systematic literature reviews using traditional methods alone. Many existing reviews rely on citation-based indicators or manual screening procedures, which can limit scalability and make it difficult to capture the evolving structure of the literature. This paper presents a text-analytics systematic mapping review of the technology-scanning literature. The workflow combines corpus construction, machine-learning–based screening, topic modeling, clustering, and similarity-based mapping to support the systematic analysis of research on technology scanning and technological change detection. Using a large collection of publications retrieved from Web of Science and Scopus, the workflow presented in this paper identifies methodological approaches, thematic structure, and emerging analytical trends in the technology scanning literature, including human-in-the-loop topic modeling, semi-supervised and guided topic modeling, and reinforcement learning-based approaches. The resulting topic clusters and their associated documents are analyzed and mapped to three main research questions (A, B, and C) and eleven corresponding sub-questions presented in Table 2. The results show that existing studies are rich in concepts but fragmented, with most models relying on predefined variables and lacking adaptive mechanisms to capture technological change. Several approaches are also semi-automated and rely on human interpretation. Even recent AI-driven approaches that generate analytical outputs are not connected to transparent analytical workflows and do not support continuous knowledge updates. The proposed workflow demonstrates how topic modeling and similarity-based analysis can be incorporated into a systematic mapping review of technology-scanning research. The findings highlight opportunities for developing more adaptive and continuously updated approaches to technology scanning.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.