Skip to content
#data science Open access

Alcohol attention bias: an examination of social drinking populations and methods of measurement

Oct 2026 · Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Abstract

Context: Attention bias to alcohol related cues has been implicated in the development and maintenance in problematic drinking behaviour. Research has demonstrated ‘alcohol attention bias’ (AAB) in subclinical drinking populations as well as problem drinkers, however this is not as firmly established in subclinical drinking populations and a variety of direct and indirect measures of attention are used to detect this phenomena. Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate and quantify AAB detection in subclinical drinking populations, investigating whether AAB was present in subclinical drinking populations when attention to alcohol versus neutral stimuli was measured. The review focused on two methodologies (visual probe and eye tracking) commonly used to detect AAB. Data sources: A systematic review of English language, peer reviewed articles were identified using PsycINFO, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases (up to and including 1st April 2019). An additional study was identified by searching relevant bibliographies. Study Selection: Only studies that used visual probe and/or eye tracking methodology to assess cognitive bias between alcohol and neutral stimuli in subclinical drinkers were included. A total of five eye-tracking studies and thirteen visual probe studies met full eligibility criteria. Data Extraction: Independent extraction of articles by 2 researchers using predefined eligibility criteria. Subclinical drinking group mean reaction times and fixation times were pooled for alcohol and neutral stimuli. Data Synthesis: Random-effects models were used to assess eye tracking (g = -0.41; 95% Cl (-0.96, 0.15); Z= 1.43;p = .15) and visual probe studies (g = -0.09, 95% Cl (-0.19, 0.01); Z = 0.1 \;p - .92) and revealed no significant attention bias effect in the subclinical drinking populations studied; Considerable heterogeneity was present in eye tracking studies. Conclusions: No attention bias was present in subclinical drinkers when eye tracking and visual probe methodology is used. Methodological standardisation and measurement issues for future research are discussed.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.