Sep 2026· Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology· Vol 19, pp. 4481· 0 citations· 55 references
TL;DR
The therapeutic potential and limits of hematopoietic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), along with induced pluripotent stem cells(iPSCs), along with induced pluripotent stem cells(iPSCs) are compared.
Abstract
Conventional cancer treatments frequently fail because of metastasis, resistance, and serious side effects, making it one of the major causes of death globally. Because of their special qualities, including their capacity to target tumors, modulate the immune system, and promote regeneration, stem cell-based treatments have attractive substitutes. A thorough comparison of the various types of stem cells, their processes, and their therapeutic usefulness is still lacking despite the large amount of research on the application of stem cells in oncology. Furthermore, more research is needed to address issues like tumorigenicity, ethical dilemmas, and delivery efficacy. Emphasizing on their mechanisms of action, therapeutic uses, and transitional hurdles, this review critically investigates the function of stem cells in cancer therapy. Here we compared the therapeutic potential and limits of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), along with induced pluripotent stem cells(iPSCs). The tumor-homing capacity of MSCs makes them extremely promising, but iPSCs provide a patient-specific, renewable cell supply that can be used in CAR-T therapy. However, their broad clinical acceptance is hampered by issues with immunological rejection, malignancy, and regulatory limitations. A paradigm shift in oncology, stem cell-based cancer therapies provide novel approaches to cancer that are resistant to treatment. Future success depends on resolving safety issues, improving gene-editing methods, and maximizing clinical translation. This review highlights important topics for further study and offers suggestions for overcoming the present constraints.
Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) are widely used in regenerative medicine due to their selfrenewal capacity and immunomodulatory functions. Increasing evidence suggests that these same properties influence tumor progression and response to cancer therapy. This review provides a detailed overview of how MSCs can be utilize...
S. Nedunchezhian, Thirunavukkarasu Palaniyandi, H. Surendran et al.· Current pharmaceutical desig...· 0 citations
Induced pluripotent stem cell technology holds great promise for cancer research and immunotherapy. iPSCs possess pluripotency and unlimited self-renewal capacity, enabling their differentiation into various functional immune effector cells such as T cells, natural killer cells, and macrophages (Macs). Genetically en...
Shao-Shuai Liang, Hong-Yang Zhao, N. Zuo et al.· Frontiers in Cell and Develo...· 0 citations
Degenerative diseases continue to impose a substantial global health burden with limited curative options. Neurodegenerative diseases, the principal focus of this review, are among the largest contributors to this burden. Stem cell therapies have emerged as a promising approach, offering the potential to replace lost c...
The development and drug resistance of breast cancer are closely associated with the heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Immunosuppressive cells, activated matrix components, abnormal vascular networks, and metabolic reprogramming within the TME collectively create a niche that promotes tumor survival. D...
Yan-Cai Liu, Yan-Ran Yang, Jiang-Long Wang et al.· Natural Products and Biopros...· 0 citations
Together, current evidence indicates that MDSCs represent context-dependent therapeutic nodes, while functional reprogramming, spatially resolved profiling, and patient stratification may improve immunotherapy outcomes.
Lisichen Zhu, Hui Liu, Sihan Zhang et al.· Cancer Letters· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.