Skip to content

Deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving decision-making: Algorithms, applications and challenges

Sep 2026 · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · 140 references
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

Abstract

Autonomous driving has the potential to greatly enhance road safety, traffic efficiency, and overall transportation effectiveness. The decision-making module serves as the core intelligence of the system, producing high-level commands for lane keeping, lane changing, and adaptive cruise control. Deep reinforcement learning has emerged as a pivotal approach in this domain, owing to its capacity to learn driving strategies through environmental interaction. This paper presents a systematic review of decision-making methods based on deep reinforcement learning for autonomous vehicles. It starts by outlining the general architecture of autonomous driving systems and emphasizing the central role of the decision-making module. The paper then explains the theoretical foundations of deep reinforcement learning, along with their applicability in driving decision tasks. Through a range of common driving scenarios, including lane keeping, lane changing, overtaking, and intersection navigation, the paper analyzes the decision-making advantages of deep reinforcement learning in complex and dynamic settings. Furthermore, it addresses key challenges in applying deep reinforcement learning to driving tasks. Compared to existing reviews, this study provides a systematic analysis of deep reinforcement learning in multiple decision-making scenarios for autonomous driving, overcoming the limitation of previous reviews that often focus on single scenarios. Adopting a progressive narrative structure, from single lateral or longitudinal control to increasingly complex tasks involving lateral-longitudinal coordination, it systematically clarifies the characteristics of different deep reinforcement learning algorithms and their applicable conditions. This structured approach helps researchers select appropriate algorithms and fusion strategies when facing driving scenarios of varying complexity.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.