Skip to content

SHIFT-Truck: A High-Fidelity Aerodynamics Dataset and Benchmark for Pickup Trucks

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 30 references
Computer Science Physics

Abstract

Pickup trucks account for 14% of new light-duty vehicles produced in the United States, yet are among the least aerodynamic. Their open cargo bed adds a flow absent from existing automotive aerodynamics datasets such as DrivAerML and SHIFT-SUV: the shear layer leaving the cab roof passes over a recirculating bed flow before separating again at the tailgate. The resulting drag lowers fuel efficiency, raises emissions and limits the range of electric trucks. Scale-resolved Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is too costly for broad design exploration; neural surrogates can predict flow features at a fraction of that cost, provided they are trained on large-scale, high-fidelity, domain-specific data. We introduce SHIFT-Truck, the first such dataset for pickup trucks. It comprises 1,000 Spalart-Allmaras delayed detached-eddy simulations (SA-DDES) of a reference pickup geometry morphed across 17 shape parameters. Each case is run on a mesh of about 100 million cells at a Reynolds number of $1.4 \times 10^7$ and released with time-averaged surface pressure, wall shear stress, volumetric pressure and velocity. The setup is verified by grid refinement and repeated runs, and checked against wind-tunnel measurements. We define geometry-grouped splits and benchmark four neural surrogates, DoMINO, GeoTransolver, AB-UPT and SMART, on surface and volume tracks. SHIFT-Truck also introduces controlled distribution shifts in the operating point, the input surface discretization and the vehicle archetype. Models with strong in-distribution performance can degrade substantially under these shifts: operating-condition changes expose failures to infer speed dependence, while tessellation and cross-vehicle shifts reveal markedly different robustness across architectures. SHIFT-Truck is thus a benchmark not only for surrogate accuracy but also for generalization across physical and numerical distributions.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.