Skip to content

Beyond Accuracy: Prefix-Invariant Realizations of Low-Precision Fast Matrix Multiplication

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 38 references
Computer Science

Abstract

Fast matrix multiplication saves multiplications through exact cancellation, but rounding sums that mix token rows can leave contributions from later tokens in earlier language model outputs. This threatens prefix invariance, which multiple-choice likelihood scoring relies on: a scored likelihood must depend only on its allowed prefix. On Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct, two fast FP8 realizations repaired to ordinary-looking accuracy still change the answers chosen by likelihood on 5.83% and 10.00% of 240 OpenBookQA items when only the text after the allowed prefix is replaced with the bf16 model's own greedy continuation. Both row-local controls, the bf16 model and a deployed FP8 matrix multiplication kernel, change none. Accuracy thus does not certify prefix invariance, and the stability criteria we analyze cannot tell realizations apart: across all 512 sign variants of two-level Strassen they stay constant while teacher-forced perplexities span a 772.4$\times$ range on the same model. We therefore construct certified realizations of two-level Strassen on bounded integer codes that quantize token rows independently, then mix and cancel exactly before rescaling, using 49 block multiplications instead of 64. Our certificate guarantees bitwise equality to a prescribed row-local classical int8 operator at the same quantization specification, so every certified realization inherits its prefix invariance. Certification thus turns realization choice into a pure cost decision: which certified realization runs can no longer change a single scored likelihood.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.