Skip to content

Pseudo-Label-Triggered Retraining from Forecast Errors for Online Time Series Forecasting

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 32 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

PILOT (Pseudo-label-Informed Learned Online Trigger), an online retraining framework that learns when to retrain from forecast-error dynamics, achieves state-of-the-art average-rank performance among retraining policies while maintaining a favorable performance--efficiency trade-off.

Abstract

Real-world time series forecasting systems operate under non-stationary data streams, where forecasting performance may degrade over time. Although retraining can recover the performance, it incurs non-trivial computational and operational costs. Under limited deployment resources, the key challenge is therefore not only how to retrain but also when to retrain. While existing retraining policies often rely on indirect indicators such as drift alarms or model staleness, we instead use realized forecast errors as direct deployment feedback. In this paper, we propose PILOT (Pseudo-label-Informed Learned Online Trigger), an online retraining framework that learns when to retrain from forecast-error dynamics. Since ground-truth retraining labels are unavailable, PILOT constructs a pseudo-label from future increases in forecast error and trains a lightweight scorer to predict it from observed error states. At deployment, PILOT uses only completed forecast errors and serves as a plug-in module for arbitrary forecasting backbones without architectural modification. We evaluate PILOT under standard multivariate forecasting settings across eight benchmarks with three representative backbones---DLinear, iTransformer, and TimesNet. Across all three backbones, PILOT achieves state-of-the-art average-rank performance among retraining policies while maintaining a favorable performance--efficiency trade-off.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Oct 2026

Look Back, Correct Forward: Error Feedback Calibration for Time Series Forecasting

Time series forecasting models are increasingly deployed in continuously evolving environments. After a forecast is issued, future observations gradually arrive and reveal how the model has failed. Existing methods mainly treat such observations as supervision for parameter updates. However, it remains unclear whether...

Hao-Nan Yang, Yu-Lin He, Zhuo Li · 1 citation
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

On Unlearning for Time-series Forecasting

Time-series forecasting is widely used in sensitive domains. Models in these settings are often trained on longitudinal user- or entity-level records, which may later require removal because they contain sensitive or proprietary information or have been corrupted by sensor failures. To address such deletion requests wi...

Ze-Yu Shi, Yan-Hui Luo, Zi-Ming Hong et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

LLM Evaluation is a Forecasting Problem

Standard procedure in machine learning is to randomly split train and test data, emulating IID draws from one underlying data distribution. In practice, models are trained on past data and deployed in the future, which may come from distinct distributions. In this paper, we find that web text is indeed highly non-stati...

R. Thomas, Adam Block, Micah Goldblum · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Self-Evolving Time-Series Forecasting Agents with Episodic Memory and Online Policy Learning

LLM-based agents are increasingly used for time-series forecasting because they can organise contextual information, perform multi-step analysis, and guide the sequence of actions required to complete forecasting tasks. Most existing agents focus only on the current forecasting instance. However, in real-world deployme...

Jun-Yi Wang, Yi-Lin Wang, Wen Wu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

RATL: Learning from Retrieved Residuals for Robust Multivariate Time-Series Forecasting

Overall, RATL shifts the retrieved object from historical target values to base-model-specific historical forecast errors, providing a plug-in, residual-memory-based paradigm for learned feedback correction in continuous-output forecasting.

Yu-Chen He, Yueyang Cang, Zhi-Yuan Ning et al. · 1 citation · ⚡1

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.