In scientific machine learning, physical fields governed by partial differential equations exhibit low-rank structure and scale invariance. When solving equations on coarse grids, missing information leads to the closure problem: modeling unresolved physics to recover lost dynamics. Although closure terms depend on grid resolution, they represent scale-invariant physical laws. A model truly learning physics should capture these mechanisms with low-rank parameterization rather than memorizing grid-specific patterns. Inspired by this, we propose the Scale-Invariant Neural Operator (SINO), which learns on normalized physical scales via a dual-branch architecture operating in spectral and spatial domains. SINO uses bottleneck MLPs to generate continuous convolution kernels, embedding an explicit low-rank inductive bias that concentrates more than 95 percent of variance in 2-3 modes, as validated by PCA across benchmarks, while drastically reducing parameters. This principled design yields 38 times steeper scaling law exponents than FNO, demonstrating superior parameter efficiency. We compare SINO with traditional models (U-Net, DeepONet), Transformer models (Transolver, Oformer, GK-Transformer), and frequency-domain models (FNO, AMFNO, UFNO) on closure problems spanning externally forced Burgers turbulence, decaying Burgers turbulence, KS turbulence, Kolmogorov-forced NS turbulence, and decaying NS turbulence. Experiments show SINO achieves 1.5-38 times error reduction and 2-23 times parameter efficiency over baselines, with superior scaling laws reflecting exceptional data efficiency from principled low-rank design. Code is available at https://github.com/AI4Science-WestlakeU/SINO.
This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.
F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al.· 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on...· 1,069 citations· ⚡112
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60
An algorithm is proposed which leverages disentangled semantic factors to generate adversarial perturbation by altering controlled semantic attributes to fool the learner towards various "adversarial" targets.
Haonan Qiu, Chaowei Xiao, Lei Yang et al.· arXiv.org· 208 citations· ⚡17
This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.
Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 27, 2026
Prabha Jha used her experience with MIT Open Learning’s program for senior executives to develop AI solutions for her employer, Verizon, and to write a book.
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.