Skip to content
#data science Open access

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF FAULT DETECTION IN MEDICAL EQUIPMENT USING MACHINE LEARNING: ALGORITHMS, PERFORMANCE, AND SCALABILITY CHALLENGES

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality and Safety in Healthcare

Abstract

Unexpected failures of medical equipment disrupt healthcare services, compromise patient safety, and increase operational costs. Predictive maintenance powered by machine learning (ML) offers a promising solution, but the effectiveness of different ML algorithms across various medical devices and data scales remains unclear. This systematic review aims to identify, analyze, and synthesize the existing literature on ML-based fault detection and failure prediction in medical equipment, with a special focus on the types of algorithms used, their reported performance, and the characteristics of datasets employed. A structured search was conducted across five digital libraries (Web of Science, ACM Digital Library, ScienceDirect, Wiley Online Library, IEEE Xplore) for studies published between January 2018 and March 2025. Studies were included if they applied ML algorithms to detect or predict faults in medical equipment and reported empirical results from real or realistically simulated medical data. Data extraction focused on problem type, dataset size, algorithm(s), accuracy/metrics, and tools. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Support Vector Machine (SVM) and its variants were the most frequently used algorithms for nonlinear fault patterns. SVM achieved high accuracy (often >90%) on small to medium datasets (≤13,000 records) but showed performance degradation on larger datasets. Ensemble methods, particularly with AdaBoost, achieved the highest accuracy (79.5%) on a large multi-institutional dataset (8,294 devices). ML, especially SVM and ensemble methods, can effectively detect faults in medical equipment, but model generalizability and scalability to big data remain significant challenges. Future research should focus on hybrid approaches that combine nonlinear SVMs with dimensionality reduction techniques (e.g., Gaussian pyramid) to maintain accuracy while handling large-scale, real-world IoT data from medical devices.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.