Skip to content

Trends, Knowledge Structure, and Scientific Collaboration Patterns in Customer Experience Research on Organic Products: A Scientometric Analysis

Oct 2026 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Organic Food and Agriculture

Abstract

Purpose: This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric and network-based analysis of 229 peer-reviewed articles (2010–2025) focusing on customer experience within the organic products domain. With the rapid expansion of the organic food market and growing consumer interest in sustainability, health, authenticity, food safety, and ethical concerns, customer experience has become a crucial factor in understanding purchasing behavior. Despite the increasing number of studies on organic consumption, consolidated knowledge regarding the intellectual structure, thematic evolution, and collaboration patterns remains limited. Previous reviews have typically been restricted to specific subthemes such as consumer attitudes, willingness to pay, or food safety, or have concentrated on individual geographic regions. In contrast, this study aims to provide a holistic overview of the global research landscape by examining key bibliometric indicators, identifying leading scholars, institutions, and countries, and mapping the most influential journals and articles.Methodology: Data collection and screening were conducted following PRISMA guidelines to ensure transparency and replicability. The search was performed exclusively in the Web of Science database, selected for its broad coverage and reliability in bibliometric studies. A total of 438 initial records were retrieved using Boolean combinations of keywords related to “customer experience” and “organic products.” After removing duplicates, limiting the document types to research articles, reviews, and conference papers, restricting the time span to 2010–2025, and excluding non-English sources, the dataset was reduced to 334 records. Through independent abstract screening by two reviewers, 229 articles were confirmed for the final analysis. Bibliometric evaluation employed both VOSviewer for network visualization and the Bibliometrix R package for quantitative indicators. Variables analyzed included citation counts, h-index, g-index, and m-index, as well as patterns of co-authorship (single- versus multi-country publications), institutional productivity, and keyword co-occurrence. This combined approach enabled both quantitative assessment and qualitative interpretation of intellectual linkages, thematic clusters, and evolving research fronts.Findings: The results reveal that China has emerged as the most prolific contributor, with 24 publications (10.5%), followed by the USA, Italy, India, Spain, and Germany. While China’s output is mainly characterized by domestic collaboration, countries such as Italy, Turkey, and the United Kingdom demonstrate higher levels of international cooperation, reflecting a more globalized research approach. Institutional analysis shows that European universities play a central role in cross-border partnerships, whereas Asian institutions dominate in terms of volume. At the journal level, the British Food Journal stands out with 35 articles (15.3%) and 922 citations, exhibiting the highest h-index and g-index among the analyzed sources. The Journal of Cleaner Production, despite publishing only 12 articles, recorded the largest total citations (1,457), highlighting its strong impact. Additionally, Sustainability (24 articles), FOODS (19 articles), and Food Quality and Preference (13 articles) also rank among the leading journals, with a strong focus on sustainability, food sciences, and consumer behavior. Collectively, these outlets have significantly shaped the scientific discourse on customer experience in organic product markets. Keyword co-occurrence analysis further highlights the evolution of the field: early studies emphasized consumer awareness, demand, and general attitudes, while recent years have seen a shift toward concepts such as purchase intention, perceived value, consumer trust, and green branding. Emerging terms like “life-cycle assessment,” “digital marketing,” and “cross-cultural behavior” indicate the diversification of research themes and the growing interdisciplinarity of the field.Conclusion: This study provides a structured overview of the evolving research landscape on customer experience in organic product markets. The findings highlight the interdisciplinary character and dynamic growth of the field, as well as its geographic diversity, with China leading in publication output, while European and Southeast Asian scholars play a central role in shaping conceptual development through cross-border collaborations. The prominence of themes such as consumer trust, sustainability, authenticity, and purchase intention reflects global trends in marketing ethics and consumer behavior. Simultaneously, the identification of emerging areas—such as digital communication strategies, green branding, and cross-cultural differences—points to promising directions for future research. The study underscores the value of bibliometric analysis as a methodological tool to consolidate fragmented knowledge, map intellectual structures, and reveal hidden connections across disciplines. These insights hold not only theoretical significance but also practical implications for marketers, producers, and policymakers seeking to build trust, enhance customer satisfaction, and foster responsible consumption in the organic sector. For marketers and producers, understanding consumer values and trust dynamics can guide strategies for brand positioning and product differentiation. For policymakers, evidence on sustainability and labeling can support regulations that align with consumer expectations and global environmental goals. Finally, for academics, this synthesis clarifies the current state of knowledge and identifies conceptual gaps that future studies can address. By mapping intellectual structures and identifying research frontiers, this study lays the foundation for advancing research that is both conceptually robust and practically relevant, contributing to the broader agenda of sustainable consumption and ethical marketing.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.