Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

Sparse Edge Inference with Martingale-Guaranteed Stability for UAV Neuro-Fuzzy Sliding Mode Control: An EKF–GNN–RL Framework

Sep 2026 · Actuators
Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems

Abstract

Running a dense neuro-fuzzy sliding mode controller (SMC) on a resource-constrained UAV edge platform forces a three-way trade-off between compute, formal stability guarantees, and robustness to uncertainty. We recast the extended Kalman filter (EKF) from state estimation into weight-space prediction, which lets the controller drop inactive fuzzy rules on the fly while retaining stability proofs built on martingale theory. The framework couples four ideas. EKF weight-space compression treats the innovation sequence as an approximate martingale difference sequence. A graph attention network (GAT) learns time-varying inter-channel coupling and feeds it straight into the SMC equivalent-control term. Reinforcement learning with Lyapunov post-regularization, wrapped in a Wasserstein distributional-robustness constraint, is shown to form a supermartingale. Finally, INT8 quantization-aware training prepares the whole stack for edge deployment. These pieces rest on a common martingale foundation that yields finite-sample pruning-error bounds (Azuma–Hoeffding), worst-case tracking bounds (Doob), stochastic stability via supermartingale Lyapunov functions, and a minimum dwell-time theorem for switching rule sets. Across 10,000 high-fidelity PyBullet simulation runs, the framework cuts active fuzzy rules by 73% on average at the cost of 0.3–0.5 cm of simulated tracking error, and the INT8-compiled inference stack attains 4.2 ms mean latency and 0.93 W measured on a Jetson Orin Nano in a bench-top (non-flight) benchmark. The hardware experiments reported here are the edge-inference benchmarks; closed-loop control results are simulation-based, and flight validation on the physical platform is left to future work.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.