Skip to content
#gene editing Review Open access

Artificially Engineered Carcinogenesis as a Biosecurity Threat: A Policy Review and Call for Inclusion in National and International Governance Frameworks

Sep 2026 · American Journal of Medicine and Health Care · Vol 1, pp. 95-99 · 0 citations · 7 references
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering

TL;DR

This paper calls for the explicit recognition of artificially engineered carcinogenesis as a potential biosecurity threat and proposes targeted policy measures to strengthen governance, including risk assessment frameworks, enhanced ethical review processes, and integration of oncogenic risk considerations into biosecurity strategies.

Abstract

Rapid advances in gene editing, synthetic biology and related biotechnologies have significantly expanded the range of biological interventions available for medical research and clinical practice. These innovations have contributed to major improvements in disease diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis worldwide. However, the same technological capabilities that enable therapeutic progress also introduce novel biosecurity challenges. Existing biosecurity and biosafety frameworks have historically prioritized infectious agents and transmissible pathogens, with comparatively limited attention given to non-communicable biological threats. One emerging but underexplored concern is the potential for carcinogenesis to be intentionally or unintentionally induced through engineered biological interventions, including genome editing platforms such as CRISPR-Cas9 systems, viral vectors, and synthetic regulatory elements. This policy review critically examines scientific evidence, ethical analyses, and governance literature to identify plausible pathways through which advanced biotechnologies could contribute to oncogenic risk. The review further evaluates existing international and national policy discussions that call for expanded oversight of dual use research of concern and emerging biotechnologies, highlighting gaps in current regulatory and surveillance mechanisms. This paper calls for the explicit recognition of artificially engineered carcinogenesis as a potential biosecurity threat. It proposes targeted policy measures to strengthen governance, including risk assessment frameworks, enhanced ethical review processes, and integration of oncogenic risk considerations into biosecurity strategies. Incorporating these measures into national and international biosecurity frameworks is essential to ensure responsible innovation while safeguarding public health and global security.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Advances and challenges in the application of CRISPR technology for environmental biological pollution control

Biological pollution, including pathogenic microorganisms, antibiotic resistance, invasive species, and harmful organisms, poses increasing threats to ecosystems, food security, and public health. In recent years, CRISPR-based technologies have emerged as powerful tools for biological pollution control due to their hig...

Xiao-Fei Zheng, Zhou-Hua Cheng, Han-Qing Yu et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Biological Threat Reduction in Lao PDR: Implementation of a Comprehensive Biorisk Program with Positive Impact on the Local Research Ecosystem

Naturally occurring or man-made pathogens can be transmitted to humans through zoonotic spillovers and accidental or deliberate release. These scenarios present a public health threat, highlighting the importance of implementing robust biosafety and biosecurity measures in both the field and laboratory, where the r...

S. Somlor, Chittaphone Vanhnollat, K. Vongphayloth et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Application of Emerging Technologies in the Antiviral Field.

This review examines the roles of four key frontiers, including organoid models, gene editing, AI-driven molecular design, and synthetic biology, and discusses how these technological frontiers contribute to disease modeling, target discovery, molecular design, and translational innovation.

Xiao-Yan Zhang, Le-Le Zhang, Teng-Da Guo et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Establishing Management Framework for Biosafety Risk Assessments of Synthetic Biology

Synthetic biology, an evolving interdisciplinary field encompassing revolutionary technologies, requires a comprehensive consideration of bioethics, and biosafety risks to drive scientific and technological advancements. To address these concerns, it is crucial to pay attention to synthetic biology governance, ethics p...

Kun-Lan Zuo, Qian-Neng Lu, Ji-Yuan Li et al. · 0 citations
#gene editing Review Open access Aug 2026

A national framework for managing dual-use research of concern: integrating biosecurity, public health, and research governance

Dual-use research of concern (DURC)—legitimate life-science research that could be misapplied to cause significant harm—has become an increasingly urgent policy challenge. Advances in synthetic biology, gene editing, and artificial intelligence have expanded both the pace and diffusion of high-risk biological work, whi...

Rui-Han Zhang · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Governing synthetic biology and artificial intelligence (AI) convergence: emerging biosecurity priorities for Africa

The rapid convergence of synthetic biology and artificial intelligence is reshaping the biosecurity landscape, yet governance approaches have not kept pace with the realities of digitally mediated biological research, particularly in African contexts. Existing global discourse has largely centred on high-level framewor...

Keletso Masisi, M. Amougou, Ilodia Amilcar Zacarias et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.