Sep 2026· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Abstract
ABSTRACT Introduction: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of infant formula use, the reasons for its use, and the factors associated with formula feeding among infants aged 0–6 months. Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study included 274 mothers with infants aged 0–6 months who were registered at selected Family Health Centers. Data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire and the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS). Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Descriptive statistics, the independent samples t-test, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for statistical analysis. Results: Among the infants included in the study, 76.6% were breastfed, while 51.8% received infant formula in addition to breast milk. Approximately half of the mothers who used infant formula reported feeding their infants formula more than four times per day, and 83.6% stated that they purchased infant formula once a week. The mean Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS) score was 58.97 ± 8.41. The most commonly reported reason for initiating infant formula feeding was the belief that formula provides greater satiety and promotes infant weight gain. Conclusions: The findings indicate a high prevalence of infant formula use among mothers of infants aged 0–6 months and suggest that maternal attitudes and beliefs regarding infant formula play an important role in feeding decisions. Strengthening breastfeeding counseling beginning during pregnancy and providing evidence-based education to correct misconceptions about infant formula are recommended to promote exclusive breastfeeding. Keywords: Infant Aged 0–6 Months, Infant Formula, Breastfeeding, Maternal Attitude.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.